Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 1 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
-
4644.PDF
[22.49 MB]
Link will provide options to open or save document.
File Format:
Adobe Reader
Since 193619;60 SEt0000000000000000 UtiUAti Ui0000000020000iig0000000000tti~i00kE; iE; fi E :00:t 0 :Xf:f t: S0000;; ;;00 0:00000:0:::0; ::00;:X: ti~iE~00iiiiW~~;l0SgXt0E0ffit~0tV000i00gStfXW400i: 1 El0000tii~i000ii00jl4004ifii~t:V0f;0iii~ti0004i000:ii:EiiiR ~Ei E :i EiL::::E:EI tEXtXlt4WQ0~ E:fi EE: ii ::i tiidEtft~fiFt00t~iXt:t0;iXi~gtfi04t000i00 /iiXtfttftfi0iii 00 i0t00tiiE EE00ift~dt000 ftFi04i4004 ii0ig04ft00 ~i I004t000 p~SEiit iC;fQ:i~ Ei:ii0fi::Si~~Eitt:iS;iEEiiiiSdiSiXT:i~CEi~iiSSii~~ii EEiidiEi~: !ii: :!iQ: Eii :iSiiiiiii Specializing in B A T O 'S CRANBERRY GROWERS SERVICE COMPLETE BOG * NETTING MANAGEMENT 0 DITCHING * @S)CUSTOM * * DITCHING HERBICIDE · SANDING APPLICATION * WPS TRAINING EkHAM, gIo * HARVESTING * BIOVECTOR (WET & DRY) NEMATODE DISTRIBUTOR Office D. Beaton P. Beaton M. Beaton (508) 295-2222 (508) 888-1288 (508) 947-3601 (508) 833-0172 Complete line of portable Crisafulli Pumps 2" -16 " M»INS Plastic netting for suction boxes lS R.A.S.P. INC. Carrying a Complete Line of: * Cranberry Chemicals and Fertilizers * Frost Alarms Thermometers * Chemical Application Equipment * Pesticide Container Recycling Program (call for details) * Kubota K-35/K41 Rental Contact: Phone: Bob or Mike (508) 866-4429 3 Plymouth St. Fax: Carver, MA 02330 (508) 866-5654 Some Bigger, None Better A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i 'Versaie easy-to-use man ocide® ishe EssnilFngiid for many veetabl programns. Its dual mode-of-action combines Mancozeb and Kocide® to mximize botht fungal and bacterial disease control, whi~leinimizing -the potential of: resistance development. MainKocide w~ets instantly suspends quickly an sty isupnsion wtmiima agitation. Spray-dried ManKocide can be conveniently mixed w~ith foliar applied fungicids inetcde ad most foliar nutrients.1 . or more iforation, askyur consultant,or chemnical Alas ed n Makciean olo oid lbl ietin 0 9 rergstrd rdim1s aio.2080 FeGriffinmGriS f pp i;;s orcallbih LLC Va37ld8 LETTERS ARE WELCOME. SEND CORRESPONDENCE TO: anbelUVrries | CRANBERRIES Since 1936 June 1999 Vol. 63 No. 5 EQUIPMENT 6 The Sandman's New Season A gantry system extends the sanding months. TRIBUTE 8 Carl Wendell Johnson, a Grower's Grower He had boundless enthusiasm for cranberries. RESEAR CH 10 Fruit Rot Studies in Massachusetts, 1998 by Frank L. Caruso Investigation include registered fungicides, compost teas and experimental fungicides. PEST CONTROL 14 CONFIRM: A Breakthrough in Caterpillar Control by Donald C.Weber The first new regular cranberry insecticide in a decade debuts for use in all regions this season. RESEARCH 16 1999 Projects Address Immediate and Long-term Needs by Gary Deziel Some of agriculture's best scientists are in our camp. Here is what they are up to. Nova Scotia 25 A Joint Adventure in the Atlantic Provinces CORPORATE 26 Northland Segues into Dilute Juice Blends 29 Decas Cranberry Products Adds Sales Manager Cover: Blossoms on Stevens vines grown by John Shurtleff of Middleboro, Mass. promise a fabulous crop. (Cranberries photo.) P.O. Box 190 ROCHESTER, MA 02770-0190 Editor & Publisher Carolyn C.Gilmore Tel: (508) 763-8080 Fax: (508) 763-4141 e-mail: cranberries @mediaone.net CONSULTANTS Massachusetts Dr. Thomas Bewick, Director Cranberry Experiment Station, East Wareham New Jersey Dr. Nicholi Vorsa, Director, Blueberry/ Cranberry Research Center, Chatsworth o Oregon Arthur Poole, Coos Co. Extension Agent, Coquille Washington Dr. Kim Patten, Associate Horticulturist, Coastal Washington Research & Extension, Long Beach Wisconsin Tod Planer, Wood Co. Ag. Agent; Teryl Roper, UWEX, Madison orresondents Patricia Carroll, Corvallis, OR Suzen Ziegahn, Wisc. Rapids, Wi CRANBERRIES, (USPS No. 136-620) is 11 times annually (onthly, a combined Dec./Jan. issue) by Carolyn C. Gilmore, at 670 Neck Rd., Rochester, MA 02770. Periodicals Postage is paid at the Rochester, MA Post Office and additional offices. Price is$25 a year; $45 for two years, $3 a copy; $30US a year in Canada payable RANpublished except on a US draft; $35US on a US draft per year in all countries.o Back copies: $3.50. ther in all other countries. Back copies: $3.50. Copyright 1998 by Cranberries. ISSN: 0011-0787 Postmaster, send form 3749 to: Cranberries, P.O. Box 190 Rochester, MA 02770-0190 Loam, Sand & Gravel Quantities of 500 yards and up inSoutheastern Massachusetts. Will dig bog to rough grade. T I TVl g~ Sam White & Sons Sand & Gravel Particles swell to 30 times their size when wet and hold 300 to M f MA 400 times their Medfield, IA weight in water. For use in new bog construction or791 when rebuilding. 508 350-71 For all your growing needs. R.E.Morse & Son, Inc. . supplying agricultural chemicals, fertilizer and power equipment ' .F. 5" -^ -'• :\ C RANBERR HIGHWAY MASSACHUSETTS 02576 Y WESTWAREHAM, 6S I(508) 295-1553 The Sandman's New Season 've: eX ....... Middleboro, Mass. -No one was more surprised than grower Peter Pi!,iI ":~i : Paquin .... himself that his 160 foot gantry sander works as well as it does. With the kind of spreader used on highway sanders, traveling along a gantry track by a system of cables, he found a way to extend the sanding season to over five months long -post harvest through December and February through April. Inspired by Atoka Cranberries in Quebec, this bridge sander was an on and off project for Paquin for about five years. When he finally finished it and tried it out, the results amazed him. This season the sander covered ".~~'f~{ about 100 acres of bog with 100-110 .... yards per acre. He moved it along five Photos, top. Peter Paquin, left, and his son, Barry, find their new home built sander gives them : months of sanding ...' : -. time. · 'i- Bottom, Paquin's . sander casts sand as. it is being loaded. A system of pulleys lifts the gantry and ... its legs off the bog when it is time to move ahead. The long extension is .. counterbalanced by .. nine tons at the loading end. (Cranberriesphotos.) =':~. page 6 June 1999 Cranberries Organic rtiizer Prod uc t A careful solution to today's environmental concerns. "I have always made it apolicy in life to identify successful people in any particularendeavor,ask theiradvice andthenfollow it... the growers who recommended KellyGreen to me are using it themselves, are experiencing yearly increases in productionand have yields my grandfathercould've only dreamedpossible when he planted ourfirst bogs. So, now I'm a life long customer and enthusiasticsupporterof KellyGreen." Robert Hawkins Bandon, Oregon June 25, 1998 KellyGreenT Fresh Fish Fertilizer Fish is an ancient and trusted nutrient. The benefits of using fish to fertilize crops have been known and appreciated since the beginning of agricultural history. It has not been widely used for two important reasons, disagreeableodor and lack of availabilitybeyond coastal areas. KellyGreenM has mitigatedthe effect of these two excuses. KellyGreenTM offers an exciting solution to the challenges of today, and to the hopes for a better tomorrow. Call for distributor and product information, or visit our web site at www.kellygreen.net Global Recycling & Research, Inc. 1000 Hilton Avenue Bellingham, WA 98225 888-676-7844 Fax: 360-676-8692 www.kellygreen.net Carl Wendell Johnson, a Grower's Grower He gave his communitya legacy of horticulturalwisdom. South Carver, MA -Most ei. oso' He had an affinity for growers in South Carver, this younger generatins, and took "cranberry capital" town of .itime and interest with those Massachusetts, had never ... coming up through the ranks known a frost season beforet in the cranberry community. this year that Carl Wendell South Carver grower, Gary Johnson was not on the bogs. Garretson recalled learning Hi bogs sand many others. from the master in the early grower relationsmdepar a lif 1980s. "Carl was doing most etable and flowerygardensan usngearl This remarkableman,tment.a life With etime'seexperience ~in. o watas, dnandtook long grower and horticulturist, of the horticultural guidance had boundless enthusiasm for on the bogs at the time and I growing cranberries, and attached myself to him so I mentored many area growers could learn as much as I could while caring for hundreds of about the nature of my acres right into his 85th year. grandfather's bogs," he said. Many regarded him as essen-"Nothing like being out for a tial to the South Carver cran-] few frost nights and then put- berry community right up un-ting on sprays for the next few til the time of his death on and then working all day to March 20th this year. prove your mettle with this "Even at 85 he was always gii_ a1, a " on wase s ad keeping up with this man who willing to try something new man. I honsty had-troubl the ays on the bog," said Nancy Kai-Carl Wendell Johnson, with booms ready to move to the was 35 years my senor. onptheabg ,"e8aid Nancy Kai-next bog during the 1998 harvest. ser, Johnson's niece, who is a nextbogduring the 1998 harvest. A lifelong farmer, Johnson supervisor in Ocean Spray's also lovingly tended his veg- grower relations department. With a lifetime's experience in etable and flower gardens and raised farm animals. He had an growing cranberries, he still tried new varieties, embraced IPM uncanny ability to grow zinnias with blooms up to eight inches and experimented with cultural practices. across. "He made it look so easy," Garretson said. "He was al- He had been married to Elsie (Carlson) Johnson for 58 ways fussing with some new concoction that would get them years. Born in South Carver, the son of the late Alex and Hulda to be bigger and better just like he would his cranberries." Maria Narhe Johnson, he lived in the same house all his life. His two oldest sons, David and Douglas, have followed in He was educated in the Carver schools. his footsteps to also become cranberry growers. Johnson was an Ocean Spray member and served on the He was buried in the Centre Cemetery, Wareham, Mass. advisory committee, plus he was a member of the Cape Cod Memorial donations may be sent to Jordon Hospital, 275 Cranberry Growers' Association. He was also one of the char-Sandwich St., Plymouth, MA 02360 or American Cancer Soter members of the Carver Sportsmen's Club, and a life mem-ciety, 1115 W. Chestnut St., Suite 302, Brockton, MA 02401. ber of the Middleboro Elks. He was a member of the United O' Parish of Carver. page8 June 1999 Cranberries IRRIGATION / SNOWMAKING l P.O. Box 66, 11 Larchmont Lane, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 Irrigation Equipment Designed Especially for the Cranberry Industry LARCHMONT is the New England Distributor for PACO Irrigation Pumps. These pumps, in most cases, are more efficient than most other brands. Pumps are available in electric, close coupled, or long coupled with SAE housing for engine mount. Larchmont will mount to engines of your choice. Example: PACO Pump: 6 x 8 x11 2000 GPM @ 140'TDH is 88% efficient and requires only 80HP at design point. This can be mounted on a Chevrolet 350 LPG engine. PACO Pump: 8 x1 0 x12 3000 GPM @ 140'TDH is 90% efficient. This can be mounted to a Chevrolet 454 LPG engine. Not only does the higher efficiency offer a saving in original cost by being capable of using a smaller engine but also your fuel consumption per gallon pumped is less. PACO has added to its Irrigation Line, a FOOD HANDLING Helixal Port Impeller Pump suitable to the Cranberry Industry. These units are available in 3", 4" and 6" suction and discharge sizes. LARCHMONT's complete inventory of irrigation accessories includes: PIPE -All sizes & types, 1/4" to 12" PUMPS -Berkeley -Cornell -Gorman -Rupp -Gould -Myers -Electric -Engine Drivers LOW LIFT PUMPS SPRINKLERS -Rainbird -Nelson -Weather Tec -Western -Brass Impact Sprinklers WEBSTER QUICK COUPLERS with RISERS -Proven! I i For information or quotes on any pump or irrigation product, call Joe or Phil at! LARCHMONT, collect, (781) 862-2550, or fax to: (781) 862-0173. Fruit Rot Studies in Massachusetts, 1998 by Frank L.Caruso Cranberry Experiment Station University of Massachusetts, East Wareham rT he following studies performed during the 1998 Screen of presently registered fungicides growing season will be discussed in this article: (1) and compost teas Screen of presently registered fungicides and compost The registrants of the chlorothalonil formulations (Bravo teas, and (2) Screen of experimental fungicides. Materials ex-Weatherstik and Terranil 6L in this study) are considering lowamined in the latter study were part of the National Fungicide ering the maximum rate of the fungicide because of the "risk Screening Program coordinated by Gary Deziel at the Cran-cup" concept in relation to the Food Quality Protection Act. berry Institute wherein some of the materials were also tested Consequently, these two formulations were examined at the in New Jersey, Wisconsin and Washington. The data presented 5.5 pints/acre rate as well as the minimum rate of 4 pints/acre. here and their conclusions are most appropriate for Massa-The spreader-sticker Plex was included with the 4 pint rate of chusetts and New Jersey where fruit rot is a problem every Terranil 6L. Other registered fungicides examined included year and where the fungal pathogens are very similar. How-Kocide 2000, Manex II and Mankocide. Also, a schedule of Bravo ever, the results and conclusions may also be Table 1.Study ofregistered fungicidesand compost teas -fruitset and rot -1998. useful to a certain degree in other growing ar-Treatment/rate Fruit set August Harvest Eight week eas where fruit rot has field rot field rot storage rot increased in its incidence during the past Bravo Weatherstik-4 pt 58.0 a 5.4 de 13.1 de 5.8 b two years. Terranil 6L -4 pt 53.0 a 5.6 de 13.7 cde 6.4 b Fungicides that are egistered agaist fruit Terranil 6L + Plex -4 pt/.125% 54.4 a 6.1 de 10.6 de 5.7 b registered against fruit rot are designated by Bravo Weatherstik-5.5 pt 54.0 a 5.9 de 5.6 e 4.2 b their trade names. Un-Terranil 6L -5.5 pt 55.3 a 3.8 e 5.9 e 4.8 b registered materials are Kocide 2000-6 lb 53.6 a 25.5 c 66.8 b 12.1 ab referred to as a particu-Manex II -3.6 qt 58.2 a 6.2 de 18.7 cde 7.4 b lar product. No endorse-Mankocide -10.67 lb 53.9 a 11.8 d 21.7 cd 7.2 b ment of any of the reg-Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt 54.0 a 10.5 d 24.8 c 10.2 ab istered materials is im--3 Manex II-3.6 qt plied by the discussion Kocde 2000 -6 lb of the results. All rates are expressed as product Cranberry/horse manure (not active ingredient) compost tea 53.9 a 38.2 b 65.2 b 14.9 ab per acre. Anyone who UMass cafeteria feedstock desires further informa-compost tea 58.2 a 44.2 ab 81.9 a 14.3 ab tion ordetails on the tri-Untreatedcontrol 60.5 a 54.4 a 85.7 a 16.7 a als should contact the _ author. Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 page 10 June 1999 Cranberries Weatherstik, Manex II and Kocide 2000 was investigated, In late April, I attended a week-long Compost School at the University of Maine, where I learned about all aspects of compost and its benefits. One of the most interesting things I learned about was compost teas and their use in the control of certain plant diseases. A compost tea is essentially a water extract of nearly mature compost that includes organic acids and phenolic compounds from the plant materials plus antibiotics produced by many of the microorganisms involved in the breakdown of the organic material. These chemicals are sup- pressive to the fungus Phytophthorainfestans which causes late blight in potato, and the soil-borne fungi Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia which cause root rot of numerous plants. Be- cause foliar applications significantly reduced the incidence of potato late blight, I thought it was worth trying out com- post teas for the control of fruit rot. Two composts were obtained for the study. Compost was obtained from piles maintained Decas Cranberries that con- sist of cranberry leaf and fruit trash from both individual bog water harvest operations and from the two receiving stations (dry and water harvest deliveries) plus horse stable bedding (manure and hay). Compost was also obtained from piles main- tained by the Physical Plant at the University of Massachu- setts, Amherst that consisted of refuse from the cafeterias on campus plus other materials. The teas were made by steeping one gallon of the compost in four gallons water for one week, mixing daily, and filtering them through several layers of cheesecloth prior to their use. These teas were applied on the same schedule as the other fungicides. Plots were established in the cultivar Early Black in one of the sections of State Bog. Three sprays of each material were applied on: JUNE 6 (8% BLOOM) JUNE 17 (70% BLOOM, 5% FRUIT SET) JUNE 29 (100% BLOOM, 50% FRUIT SET) Each treatment was replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design in 25 ft2 plots. Sprays were applied using a CO2 backpack sprayer with one flat fan nozzle at a pressure of 40 psi. The compost teas were applied using a Solo backpack sprayer with a similar nozzle at a pressure of 30 psi. A preliminary assessment of field rot and fruit set was performed on August 20 by selecting 20 uprights per replicate and counting the number of pedicels, the number of fruit, and the number of rotted fruit. Berries were hand-picked from a 4 ft2 area in the center of each replicate on September 8-10, counted and evaluated for the presence or absence of field rot at five days after harvest. Sound berries were sorted and stored at 38"F for eight weeks. Standard cup counts and 100 berries were weighed to determine whether the treatments had any effect on berry size. Separate samples were taken for color analysis to determine whether any treatments had a deleterious effect on anthocyanin production. After eight weeks, berries were evaluated for storage rot by sorting out rot a second time. The data are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Bravo Weatherstik and Terranil Table 2. Study ofregistered fungicidesand compostteas -6L were compared for their efficacy berry at the lowest registered rate (4 pt) size and weight -1998 and the rate (5.5 pt) commonly Treatment/ra Mean cupWeightused by growers. Both Treatment/rate Bravo Weatherstik -4 pt Terranil 6L -4 pt113.0 -pt Terranil 6 L + Plex -4 pt/.125% Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt Terranil 6L -5.5 pt Kocide 2000-6 lb Manex II -3.6 qt Mankocide -10.67 lb Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt Manex II -3.6 qt Kocide 2000 -6 lb ~~~~~Koci~~~~~~~de 2000-~6 l~bcontrol of both field rot and stor- Cranberry/horse manure 109.7 b 85.7 ab 0.87 ab cro bt i t a sto age rot, but it was inferior to the compost tea two chlorothalonil fungicides. Poor UMass cafeteria feedstock 113.7 b 74.5 c 0.75 c control of both rots resulted when compost tea Kocide 2000 was utilized; this fun- Untreated control 134.0 a 80.2 be 0.80 be gicide should not be used as the sole fungicide where fruit rot incidence Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 is histocally high in a particular Cranberries June 1999 page 11 Mean cup Weight (g) Mean berry chlorothalonil formulations afcount 100 berries weight (g) forded excellent control of both field rot and storage rot at the 5.5 114.7 ab 91.4 a 0.91 a pt rate. Field rot incidence in- b 92.5 a 0.93 a creased when the rate was reduced 113.0 b 92.5 a 0.93 a 107.6 b 95.0 a 0.95 a to 4 pt, but storage rot incidence only increased slightly. The addi 115.2 ab 90.9 a 0.91 a er Plex to tion of the spreader-sticker Plex to 114.6 ab 91.2 a 0.91 a Terranil resulted in a slightly re127.1 ab 81.5 ab 0.82 ab duced incidence of field rot. This 116.7 ab 90.4 ab 0.90 ab further supports previous work that 122.0 ab 89.3 ab 0.89 ab indicates that these additives are 122.7 ab 87.3 ab 0.87 ab probably not needed with the chlorothalonil fungicides. Manex II and Mankocide gave acceptable bed. The Bravo/ Table 3. Study of experimental fungicides-fruit set and rot -1998 i Manex/Kocide fungi- Fruit set August Harvest Eightweekcide schedule did not Treatment/rate/%/ bloom rot rot field rot storagfield result in acceptableield rot control, probably because the third fun-Product A -4 oz (15%) 58.3 a 6.8 ab 33.3 d 12.2 b gicide was Kocide and Product A + Latron B1956 -4 oz (15%) 56.2 a 8.5 ab 25.4 cd 9.3 b infections during the Product B-0.3 lb (15%) 58.3 a 10.1 b 30.9 d 10.5 b latter portion of Product B + Latron B1956 -0.3 lb (15%) 60.2 a 14.4 b 34.2 d 11.2 b abloom in Product C bloom resulted in el-12.8 oz (15%) 59.7 a 7.0 ab 11.7 bc 5.9 ab evated levels of rot in Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (15%) 58.8 a 10.3 b 10.2 b 6.7 ab the field and in stor- Product C + Latron B1956-12.8 oz (40%) 59.3a 8.6ab 12.0bc 5.6ab age. The compost tea from the UMass caf-Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (60%)1 57.2 a 11.2 b 8.7 ab 5.5 ab eterias had no appre-Untreated control 56.8 a 43.9 c 77.1 e 18.4 c ciable effect on either rot. However, the Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 compost tea from the cranberry/horse manure signifi-Table 4. Study of experimental fungicides-berry size and weight -1998 cantly reduced field rot compared to the other compost tea Treatment/rate/% bloom Mean cup Weight Mean berry and the untreated control. It count 100 berries weight (g) certainly did not result in acceptable rot control. However, Product A-4 oz (15%) 106.3 ab 95.5 ab 0.96 ab the compost piles had not been Product A + Latron B1956 -4 oz (15%) 103.1 b 98.8 a 0.99 a turned on a regular basis and Product B -0.3 lb (15%) 110.4 ab 93.4 ab 0.93 ab consequently, the cranberry | Product B + Latron B1956 -0.3 lb (15%) 111.7 ab 92.0 b 0.92 b compost was probably not at the Product. C -12.8 oz (15%) 106.3 ab 95.3 ab 0.95 ab maturity necessary for the best 12.8 oz (15%) 114.4 a 92.1 b 0.92 b maturity necessary for the best Product C + Latron B1956 There were no deleterious Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (40%) 108.0 ab 94.2 ab 0.94 ab effects by any of the treatments Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (60%) 106.8 ab 94.7 ab 0.95 ab on fruit set, berry size, or berry Untreated control 114.3 a 84.3 c 0.84 c weight. Three applications of Manex II significantly reduced Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 the color of berries (data not shown) compared to the other treatments. Surprisingly, both Bravo and Terranil also had a (1) JUNE (15% BLOOM), JUNE 19 (80% BLOOM, 10% deleterious effect on color development. This effect has never FRUIT SET), AND JULY 1 (100% BLOOM, 65% FRUIT SET) been observed for the chlorothaloni-fungicides. (2) JUNE 12 (40% BLOOM), JUNE 22 (90% BLOOM, 15% FRUIT SET), AND JULY 2 (100% BLOOM, Screen of experimental fungicides 70% FRUIT SET) These trials were conducted in plots that were adjacent to J 25 (9% BLOOM, 25% the first study (Early Black). Plots were established in similar (3) ( 160% ), JUNE 2 BLOOM, SET) JNE L (% fashion to the other study. Product A showed good potential in the 1997 trials; it was reported as Product #2 (Cranberries, Materials were applied similarly to the other study. A pre- June 1998 issue). Product C did not perform as well in the l a evaluation of fie d fruit set was performed on 1997 trials, but it was suspected that it would perform better liminary evaluation d on September 7-21 and of fiel in the presence of an adjuvant (reported as Product #3 in the A 1 uguserres as descried previousl. The dat wn were a above art. all procedures were as described previously. The data are shown above article). Product B is in the same chemical group as . Product C; both of these materials were tested with and with-Regardless of the timing of the first application, the best out the addition of an adjuvant. The adjuvant used in all treat-rlof both field and storage rot were obtained by the Prodments was Latron B,1956 at a concentration of 0.06%. Prod-control of both field and storage rot were obtained by the Prodments was cpLatron B1956 at a concentration te 0.06f . Prod-uct C treatments. It performed better than Product B of simiuct C was compared on three schedules with the first applica-lar chemistry and Product A that did not fare as well as it did tion at either 15% (utilized also for Products A and B),. . 40%1 Iin 1997. The addition of the ' l ado P odc adjuvant did not enhance the or 6 0%. The three schedules employed were: page 12 June 1999 Cranberries efficacy of any of the three materials. Interestingly, the best fruit rot control was achieved by the application of Product C initially at 60% bloom (although not statistically significant). Berries treated with Product the largest, heavi- A were est and had the best color (data not shown), although not statistically differ- ent from the other treatments. There were no deleterious effects caused by any of the treatments. Research will likely be continued with both Products A and C in 1999. Acknowledgments These trials could not have been con- ducted without financial assistance from Griffin Corporation, Rohm & Haas Com- pany, Terra, and Zeneca Ag Products. I wish to thank Jane Mika, Peter Larsen, and Kate Muldoon for their assistance throughout the various phases of the research, David Nolte (Decas Cranberries, Inc.) and Dr. Steven Goodwin (Department of Micro- biology, UMass, Amherst) for the corn- posts, and Gary Deziel (Cranberry Insti- tute) for his coordination of the national cranberry fungicide screening project. AA DA RL JI i /l IilliIlil I l 1wl~0l% V 4 l Farm Credit am re The first choice of ag businesses. \ C AO Everyone likes choices That's why, more Everyone likes choices. That's why, more than ever, business-wise cranberry growers turn to Farm Credit for real estate mortgages, short or intermediate term loans and other financial services. We work one-on-one with you to find solutions that are right for your business. Our rates are competitive, and you will receive the kind of personal service you expect from an organization whose only business isagricultural finance and service. Business-wise farmers like Farm Credit's choices and personal service. What about you? Examineourchoices.Comparethemwith any bank's. Then give us a call. First Pioneer Farm Credit, AC.A. 67 Bedford St., PO.Box 720 Middleboro, MA 02346-0720 (508) 946-4455 Farm Credit Services P.O. Box 369 Sparta, Wl 54656 1-800-236-3148 G.A.F. Engineering Inc. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WATERFRONT & COASTAL ENGINEERING REGULATORY COMPLIANCE D.E.P. WETLAND FILINGS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITS WATERWAYS LICENSES E.P.A. PERMITS ~LEGAL G EARTH REMOVAL PERMITS ENGINEERING ,~ LAND SURVEYING PLOT PLANS PERIMETER SURVEYS LAND COURT PLANS CONSTRUCTION STAKING CONSTRUCTION STAKING ~~~~DESCRIPTIONS WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PERMITS CRANBERRY BOG DESIGN COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING TEL: (508) 748-0252 454 WAREHAM STREET *P.O. Box 953 *MARION, MA 02738 FAX: (508) 748-0542 Cranberries June 1999 page 13 OUR AD ISN'T THE BIGGEST BUT IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SUPPLIES, CRANBERRY EQUIPMENT ENGINEERED DESIGNS AND PROMPT SERVICE WORK. STEARNS IRRIGATION, INC. * 790 FEDERAL FURNACE ROAD * PLYMOUTH, MA 02360 PHONE: (508) 746-6048 * FAX: (508) 747-3086 CALL US TOLL FREE: 1-888-899-4225 ..ESTATE PLANNING... .. ATEAM EFFORT t may take the combined efforts of your attorney, accountant, tax professional and your insurance agent to help you create your plan. But a member agent of The Nautitus (Groutpcan bring more to the table. Members have access to a professional staff with specialties in law, taxation, accounting and insurance to provide strategies in Estate Conservation and Business Succession for you and your professional advisors. for a free brochure and let us show you what teamwork is about. Bradford L. Meigs iMlnnbemAcfet 4 LA/ 800 Sou:th Street, Suite 6 10 Waltham, MNA0(2453 Phone: IFax: Fax. (781) 647-9200 (781)89-6r)i8AuS4an6(781) 899-4(])61 Ill O, ASohervic ofrThe.Y ' N ie onsur e Co.C CONFIRM: A Breakthrough inCaterpillar Control by Donald C. Weber Agricultural Science Group Ocean Spray Cranberries The first new regular US cranberry insecticide registration in ten years has been granted by the US federal EPA to tebufenozide (Confirm®2F), a selective insect growth regula- tor with broad activity against lepidopteran pests. The com- pound is a reduced-risk biorational safe for bees, birds, and fish, as well as handlers. The registrant, Rohm & Haas, will be issuing a label for rapid registration in the various cranberry- growing states. This new registration represents the fruit of the cranberry industry's pursuit of reduced-risk registration, and a real off- the-shelf technology for growers to use in 1999, at only slightly higher cost per acre than conventional insecticides. Partners in this effort include growers associations, Ocean Spray, the Cranberry Institute, Rutgers University, Washington State University, University of Massachusetts, Rohm & Haas, and the IR4 project. Analytic work as well as field trials for the Pacific North- west region were performed in Canada, in support of both US and Canadian registrations of Confirm. Registration is now pending in Canadian cranberries with an URMULE (User- Requested Minor-use Label Extension) request submitted by the Pacific Agricultural Research Centre of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Agassiz, British Columbia, to the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) in Ottawa. At a recent meeting in Ottawa, Minor Use Coordinator Douglas Rothwell expressed optimism that the URMULE would re- ceive rapid review, Tebufenozide, the active ingredient of Confirm®2F,mim- ics the action of the natural insect hormone 20- hydroxyecdysone, the physiological inducer of the molting and metamorphosis process in insects. Tebufenozide is an IGR insect growth regulator -because it regulates the molting pro- cess. More specifically, it is a MAC -molt accelerating com- pound. Tebufenozide controls lepidopterous larvae through a novel mode-of-action by the induction of a premature lethal molt which initiates within hours of ingestion of treated crop surfaces. The activity is primarily through ingestion, so that toxicity is dependent on the feeding behavior of the target pest, and thorough coverage of the treated plants. Unlike some Bt's, which are also stomach poisons, tebufenozide is more persistent on foliage, as long as it is allowed to dry on before rain or irrigation. When caterpillars ingest tebufenozide, actual death will take several days to occur although feeding by the insects generally ceases within 24 hours of ingestion. Tebufenozide is highly active against most lepidopterous larvae while having practically no activity at typical use-rates against other orders of insects. This selectivity allows for the conservation of beneficial and predatory insects which is a key element in suppression of most cranberry pests. Confirm performance has been excellent in several field trials against blackheaded fireworm. Sparganothislarvae are also very sensitive, although in the post-bloom fruit-feeding generation, growers and researchers are planning trials to determine optimum timing. The cutworm picture is promising, too. New Jersey aerial field trials against blossomworm and false armyworm, by Dan Schiffhauer of Ocean Spray and Sridhar Polavarapu of Rutgers, showed a drastic post-treatment decrease in both species. The material is effective on at least some spanworms, but more work is needed here. Gypsy moth is very susceptible, as shown by years of work in forestry. Confirm may or may not turn out to be a useful tool to manage cranberry fruitworm, because of the lack of contact activity. Except with blackheaded fireworm, more experience is needed with Confirm chemigation applications to define the efficacy of this application method. Despite some gaps in the efficacy picture, the proven efficacy of Confirm against several key lepidoptera should give it an important role in cranberry insect management in all regions. Growers are eager to put this breakthrough material to work, while researchers continue to test additional reduced- risk tactics. t Cranberries June 1999 page 15 1999 Projects Address Immediate and Long-term Needs by Gary Deziel, Manager Research and Communication, Cranberry Institute Commodity shines in research support When you scan the list of research projects in the follow- ing pages, what strikes you first? The number of projects? The range of topics? The number of sponsoring organizations? All of the above? Cranberry is a minor star in the North American agricul- tural universe by most measures (compared to corn, wheat and soybean, for instance, which are planted on nearly three-hun- dred million acres in the U.S. and Canada). But cranberry growers, handlers and associations outshine most commodi- ties when it comes to supporting agricultural research. The Wisconsin Cranberry Board (WCB), fueled by a 10 cent per barrel check-off and burgeoning production figures, is the biggest player in the commodity-based funding picture. The WCB funded twenty-five 1999 research projects to the tune of $233,000. Although lower in total funding, associa- tions and councils in New Jersey, British Columbia and Quebec also contribute at per-barrel levels similar to their Wisconsin brethren. Massachusetts, Oregon and Washington State all have active research programs as well. On the industry side of the ledger, Ocean Spray Cranber- ries, Inc. is a very significant research sponsor. Ocean Spray's Outside Research Grant Program, which is coordinated with ongoing in-house research and development, has funded more than thirty projects for the 1999 field season. The Cranberry Institute, supported by eight Supporting Members', continues to focus on reduced-risk pesticide evalu- ation and registration, pheromone-mediated mating disrup- tion of Sparganothis fruitworm and blackheaded fireworm, and biological control of pests. CI funding for 1999 is set at $159,800. Scientists make support work The commodity is also fortunate to have some of agriculture's best scientists in our camp. We have men and women working in concert with growers to crack the hardest nuts in cranberry production. There are researchers who are working on immediate commodity needs -such as conducting IR-4 residue trials to begin pesticide registration of new products. There are some working on mid-term needs -such as implementation of new insect control strategies, including pheromone-mediated mating disruption and biorational pesticides. And then there are others conducting experiments which poke at the edge of cranberry knowledge -including geographic information systems and varietal improvement. Many researchers have been very successful at receiving grant money from outside the commodity (see insert). These grants can be very competitive. They also tend to be in healthy portions and support long-term goals of sustainability. And bottom line -the grants make grower money go further. Funding agencies act in coordination All told Cranberry associations, councils and foundations provide approximately $400,000 for research. Ocean Spray and the Cranberry Institute funds, when combined, nearly match that amount. All that hard-earned cash is spent on high-pri ority research topics set by growers through committees like the Institute's Environmental Research Committee, the Wisconsin Cranberry Board and CCCGA's Research Committee. Research coordination, therefore, is very important -particularly to growers who want to be assured that no duplication is occurring between regions. Every penny is impor tant. This past winter an effort to better coordinate the research funding decision -making process was made by all the major funding organizations. While CI acted as the clearing house for research proposal information, proposal coordination could not have been done without the leadership provided by Joseph DeVerna, Ocean Spray Agricultural Research, Tom Lochner, WSGCA/Wisconsin Cranberry Board, Jeff LaFleur, Cape Cod Cranberry Growers Association and oth ers across the U.S. and Canada. Supporting members are: Les Canneberges Atoka, Inc., Cliffstar Corporation, Decas Cranberry Sales, Inc., Eagle River Cranberry Handlers, Hiller Cranberry Sales, Inc., Northland Cranberries, Inc., Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., and Oregon Cranberry Co. page 16 June 1999 Cranberries orted~~by marks..r~esearche.~~ such.~ Dr.A~sampling~~fr~.chides.Mic.r.. corn- I :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Outs~~~~~~of ing GreasesrcCrommodity'ls rhuned istdabevain fol ES. Ltd. ESC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cropconsult Masahset.Dprten f od..grcutre... MF Oregon Assocatio.OCG Cranberry Gr~~~~~~~~~~~~~aplitowers'.. Ou~~~~~~~~~becGrowers ..... QCGA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..... Association Cranberry .. ScienceColumbiaofBritish .......... SCBC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... Council United Departmentof Agriculture/Cooperative State Research Education & Extension ....Service USDA-CSREES~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... States ofMassachusetts UMD~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...... University -Dartmouth Agod&Agiculture,.h Wah tV ot'd^oucsS cnrbtosicdefdrl. rst .fMassac~husetts.rofatmno UW-PURR~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... Universityof Pesticide Use Risk Reduction Project Wisconsin . .USA.usaialeAgicltreReerc.&Edcaio.SR .. :'^''. ' -^ un mg-rga ^ '-^ ;'-^^---;-'-^^ '-^ -. -^-.-Abbrevviiao t iztio ^-'^ ':'! " -^!:l-~y^^:l:-ion'':^ Stat Comsin. nPsiid.eitato.SP WashingtonCranberry WSCC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.................... Washington~~~~~~~~~~~... State Commission .... WisconsinBoard WCB~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....... BC rabery:'Grwes'Association BCCGA-i' Jne199 ag 1 .... .. Cranberry~~~Canerie . .3 :. ^^^ CGA Funding f Cape ap-er ............Association an. of the Coa u.Itrowers' rC t proximatClean! $800C00nb cationsultsng efio ated mating disru pro-ifron:thesesouces ofcourse: remsub dif echnique AtocasQuebec which ha.ye wedntment T pestiCidAQs t c C$26.ry Bird Banding Project iyear dor comerciapote ran berry scie(.ns hranberry in ng a. g s f i Pov ca ns fd Ma"crane'rryre .': Cropconsult:.' ' Ltd.'-E.S.-ESC .. -—^..\.,^-'-'^;:—;j;:;. Institut de Recherche etoDeveloppement en Agroen-ironnement (Quebec) IexA er registration Interregional Research Project 4Numb(minor pesticide crop in the US) eR-4 Massachu CranberryResearchse tts Foundation -CRF nal Nat io Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada) NSERC Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. iOSCi' ^ a re gon f CGhtA Cranberry Growers'Associathon . uebecnCranberryeGrowersAssociation a QeA. yrla a SciencerC o unctl iS.e of BritishtColumbia .workUniteoSterms.highepr-.en. mAnagculte/Coopentaswe RedearctihnProd.catihousExdate side th~ aIUSDA-CSREES University of Massachusetts -Dartmouth UMD University of Wisconsin UW-PURR Pesticide Use Risk Reduction Project USDAiSusta inable Agr iculture Research Education SAyEg Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration WSCPR Washingt on WSCC State Cranberry Commission WisconsinCranberry Board AssoiatonWCC -: -:C manberry C page17l Cra:;! ' .: ':: -': "' : : : ^: ' --' -.::: ; ': : ' June 1999 I IIi I--l~~iiiil1-11-11 1'll-llllll~. 13!l :.i' -: I:I I::I -I-lli~liilliiiiiilll-lil'I.-Ill::I -I.~''Iff l !^: . ' : llii NamelAffiliationlPoiecItI TitleFundedIb I I ::·t:r~ --ll l...ll."I..-IIIIlegion-SARE^. ll ]..;l'1?. 3-;ef :..III-.: IC :.I&.,I. J: ::~I: :::. I Annejl ill.: .I.. : ~:: , II: I I I~II~B. :] OCGA :::~l:...-I :.I11"~"~l III. ~~. , ~ I angemntlf ranerr Wevi · :B: Cl&l Drl.lli Averilllill UlsslmhritliBolgylnd l:le I I -—1,I I:;,I -r--II ''. 11.-l.Ifl~I :-eIsev I C^G IIS03&.^Sp Connillj~li~llibslandiBlueberrylandiCranberr ieil Stui!lillB ^l~ I,-13ll u~tog I I -^i^:I^' ' '^~:"!X^-3I^.~'~:^~ I. .. -"I -II-"^ -1 ''~~~.~I -'^l~fl-^^^'P llll~~lliil~~liliil~oflBlakheaded Fireormin Britis Columbia OS !l tlnk: ~: : nle—::A M n and Bioonro of Micoi ^I'^llU::l'- II-llr ~nac Improvin i others I -gO...~i: ) I I !~i' .. ::s·~a~:~ ::,.I ~ . :mi : :.--i .:Il · tin l:t~: .11I~. ~is:: Cl, WCI ~~~ I I .1.I .Dr1. Da... MahrI I U-MaIso . * Implementation~ of:Mating Dirpion of Blackheaded ~ OSCI,~ USDA: II Ms.ISIel lee & ES En g l HI ::i BO ACECR&OSC3 Dtll~lr. ESC______Impllementlin.Biological__Control___of._Blackheaded_______CGA __&'::"-BC DeborahHenderson e:t:ci~ -:: ~·Bt IIIeIIa:i:s-&~nsiIIIn I ~ : s .. E~. .1o:I ..I II -II1. 1,I · :::~:: i : P :. II::: I.1. :.-1.IIII: I1III.ri]: v~: r : :-N:o:: l--I on. BartonMatsuoto~ass-— Grwe Gan ~1.s OrganticCranberryBogserrylitworm II-II.1, .I. III I-a:-P 1.111 j 1,:R u:] 1:lILIIf. IIsto.I .I. ...eI: I . I.II p aiI IPo -N: J. : .I I I I I : : tor.for Cranerry (NJSUIi Scoia IDr.:x::~::: : I-II: .. I-~:oi-na -an an Dr. Kenin Mac.renzrIe AMi a Pathogens ofI Pests AAFBCCAIn & Ms. Mi WC CQPA ofiseldon Ari .y USC .. t~ I.I JBC,:I .1,I&IWC ~~II ~::.I. of o IIIIII ::nt :::r. : :: :-I x. : d I-:"M :.: I.: ]]I : :~::I I ,~ :~ I I I-1o :: :-...I,' Dement ~ ~::: alnes } nistor ingset/Fun Manag in CraInbserr I ,l ::in:: I S ca: 11I 1 :I . I. II1I1 s I I. 1.1 , ~ 1 .. a: Of-S~:~: 1.I.I-i-tIhS~:. I :: 1rI CII, b r::I. ru.1. -:.III i111-:.M AP. A IIN SE . II ~..: .I~...-I . I ~.~aI.. ..I .1.. .1. ..IR i .,II.. 11.. Drs.Doug Patrogmn, St.MaryAsCUnivS ~.:I I ,..1 -. . I-I:I :·iY :lu ];;-::fII -1 I.an. :.-~:. I --I l ] : :T -I I. I I ..I: ~~ --~ : Mn I...I.D..I InsectII WSCCbw I Dr Kim Pate ~ ~: CecAppranber : i1 I . WSUI: ~ * C . I. e 1~I I :I::: :: 1. .I,. I tIIII-. CrIManberry Insneciie Aernatis & Trniti USDA-CS : -:II. :I C::::, 1.I1.I ,.~.II ,~.. Is. ..-.iIj .I I.. ..-.. 11I :I:r : ..I I II IV~II II I. (.I I. I . I .II~ I II ~ ~~ for the~tePaii NorthwestC~ll i~~~~~~~~~~~Srtge Dartmouth Be ~.I1. B onCrane ____________________ iNanbery havior of ogs Beds I, ~.."~. ~ ~ I~-~ :::~:. I~.-~~: . :~] I-: I~:: ::::~ ::II :1 I.. ; :: I-:II X:::~~~~~~~:~ :::::::I~;II . III.. :: i:. i II r: 1 : -. II-:II:: ::r;III:::II I ; IIII1 I:iI:--I ::I I-::::~~~~:,.----1. I ~ ~ ~ ~ I:X~~:~~:~: -::: ~ ~ ~ 111. I.11.11 ,.. -.I.-.-II .-.I: ' ..I-, I . I I I --I I-I 1. I I I I .I .: : 1 .-I I I: I III SACI RE I --I.. •CranberryPoIlnaetioneAtraivs^ rniio : '..I 9 -i-: :I -. ,--::: --I. :(:::;I ·-I:: :--. .. .: II :,: a.. I1 1-..::e . I..:.:I.:~]I 1I-1. , 1 I I'.I .I. ,. : -~ni I::: -r:II 1 -l-1I.-; .: : : :..II III :I. -:: :~_,1I, _::!:: :: of Populationdl NJCRC I Dr.K Sidhar PolavarapuRutge Ni*Saonal LokifestoryonOtimDvelopme Firwomtinisfonshaifino&rUW-PUR II iistem, :InsectII Dr.Brtonatsumto U ss-• ThveDstributions te fe^^ M 1I.~ II I I: I MneimatordIen e andManagement1IIo Si &OaaiisSfCaberCritwr nd RducedRisk Reoivna Sridhargraing ehaviralBioloical N SAREte Ij-.. '--:::/ :: : :' ;:: I:ntI-a I Bhvoa Bil gical-oandReduced-Ri... sk NE Reio- Dr. DavidhaMcavrthur RutofeBCs A ReducalLied-risk eticide BaedelonpPlnt Essenultial— CNJBCRCGA&ohr Drs.KimPatten,WSUtsofCranberr nsc est Mnagementr mleettin UDACRE i Natonal Workshopo r I~~arfm~~th~ ~ a~OptmaseoInctidl C&OS on theo Behvio of Honey Be on CranberryBreds Scargabswith sexPheromonesuI OCSCCA l &S C M 'Cont ofSoilrol I MrI.PaulkRobin Cornll emetR OCtNB R ,O C C • Ianvsiatioensof theaffetofhi Orutheneandent;yrn e I.-S M. MIch Roy w U IRDA · Cranb:erryfrutworm(Acrobasi vaccinii)nagem Cl, MAA:QNE . I~~~~~~~~~~o th Spin Cuwom andsSpanorm Comlex ::i''i~~n'MahriaDr·S UofMN _____• EtMnhagemnt ine CranbWCBCranberry__ S~~~~idhaT~ ~ MngmngtPcestsnofCrNberrIesecticiNewoSrganothispFruitwormJersey by'r C NJB & of theU ~Spri~ b O .Ms Monika Weldn C\SCC .* Cultura Coedi~~ntro of Spranti FriwrSCC 3 : g ~ ~ o Cranberriesf~e :~~~~~~~~~~~hog n~tO th Useof Floodingrhn~~? O~~ S page~18 Jun ~199 Cranberriess O Cnb~B~ i;^l::-;.^-.^3:':.^^ j '/:-'^3:-Pher__o aigDsuto -'-. moemdae n Cranberries______________________________: ~::,I1~~,1~: 1~~~1 I ~~~~~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ : I :: :,: ' ': ::I -I I :1: I : . I ,:I : 'I::I:: :: I :: ' ' :I::: 1;;I : II -:,, · I·:i _:, .: iiiiiiI- -"~~~~~·i-i-·i-~;i~:,a.11II ~ i.I~~ llll~llIilll: ~~::I~~~I~-lIIS-IIIIIISIIIIIIMlllllllllllIllllllill :::~ ~~1:~~i::;_i:::I~i~i : .~~I~ ~ ~,:::~: :~:~!~~I I aded NaMme~ A~;ffjliation I.Project Tite_.·. Fun`.· b I I _ _ I _ i iI ~] ]I.I.I :: _ I ~I ~I~II Y _II Enhancing The'rmalConditions in Cold-Watert ..1.. I--,,,:I1 .. 1.. .:e:: I: IN~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~1 Stream f ~~~~~~~f~~eceivin~ 11 .. -__-:i]I: :I: I:::: :II]:]I I]~~1~ l ::I :: ^l)lIIllIlIllII lltI ~II IS : ranberyIIBo W t Supp.IlesI Dr SkaynenupaU~ass-·Dartmoth*Adace Oiato Process~~r forRRemoal ofTrace :UMD : , 11 : : I ~~~~~~~~~~~t·S.T ~ ~1-~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. :: .: -: ~ ~~ ,eI-~:I.I I I I ~ ~~.. II. : -ro.1 .I I L::.kA.. I:: ltIati. ..-I I -: Tabi¹le 4 InterdisciSiaStuiesM ; _ IIh i]!I .:~ ~.111I:~~I ~:~~~:II~~riIwea-~Ii Ii ~:II f I.-.? "~~pm: ~I, r f.17Ie:: (1II1 I I( i I I ] I :I Drs-Iarolyn U ass-Amherst * Water Management of Cranberry COOGA~CI,QSC& ,SAREII Anne Aver & llllllhllllllllj~lll M'^1"ls.l lll Hilary Sandierl^ Teryl Roper I-I on Cranberry in Wisconsin II. .: . I I II.I I.1II ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ II :]d~i:II!g I: : m . "1Drs. :Pi"/illl^l -^^ Kim Patten^ -lWSU^ }; .& POQGIRFI IIi Pesticis.1 I 1:I1 Steve Booth 1 G irdlerUsingLow-lternative_______________ Mls. ;Caroline Turcotte—CETAQSeyan i op V 1..I.II11 .1.11 ...aIII I:tBSM Dvelopm enti Iandthe Identification of a French Guide for .sJo11-.: ____________oI inQ : .' I sanrd'Detectionoteai Insc t o Cranber -Drs.NlckVorsa, ' Rutgers *Cranberry & Bleerre in ises-C E :Ii -: I-1 I .-:; ; ~,^: ^ : '1~:II-': ^ -^ -:---' -I^I^ ' '-I--':I rner BlackiaioWevi II ::.rsan : ~ ~ --^V ^"~~~ l:I ::^ --• I. I-. '; ^ Dr.KmPte S nse Managem'en^'t os Vin an Crnery QOGAeb: ;• Peter Oudemana i ^ &;Sridhar Polavarapu.^. ^-'"^^^': •^^^:-^___________________________ :; Table MIscellaneousResearch IProects : IName' -. Affiliation^ :-.Project Ttle -i -'-; : -:-—; •hU!i:::-.: ::rFunde~d by; . .:.:/: - Dr. William Bland—UW-Madison—*Bog-Specific Temperature Forecast Calibration — WCB — Mr.Willlam Frantz OSOC*Sumay o 198PeticdeUs C Ms. Joanne Mason CCBBP * Osprey Anti-electrocution Program CO____COGA _______: & Cl Drs. Patty McManus, UW-Madison * uIad xes u r o xtninWB Dan Mahr Fruit Specialists . &'ITeryl RIoper I : " -: -I; •''. " . Dr. Peter Oudemans Rutgers * s fRmt esn oEtmt aito nNJBCRC &OSC _~~~~~~~fanoperaiv Sura e ________ __________________________Cranberry Yield and)'Development of a_____^_______________ Ground-Truthing System,; : Dr. Lee Estes UMD * Remote RadiometricCranberryBgSrs UMD .',.-.::l .1 ' ^^ :: , research Effor'.t________________I_________:_-____'I Mr. Arthur Poole —OSU — Bandon AgnrMetWeather Station Operation —G: O ::& Mr. Andy Broaddus OSCO ______ and Maintenance__________________________'\ : :: Dr. David Wang UW-Platteville * Engineering Modification of Boom Sprayers and the WCB -·r-'~~ 1:: : :: i. _ x enso gc ea er ag ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CE -,I ^____________________________________________;-.II- : ResearchII I I WSCGA1WSCGA * Crnberry Weath:erFo—-reat WVCB ::::' I'CC i-.. itteeI ' Iomm ' — · '' ' '::: --__________I___—I -] .I :: :;^^ 'WSCGA : WSCGA o I I ';l h^L.l: l-^!---dI WCB:' ^I -•I • !:-i: - 'II lPublic '-State Fair B ;-Relations CommIttee _________*Cranberry•Promotional DispIa s WC_________VB___________'^ . --WSCGA Education:-.W;SCGA *Bohr Pitn C . C ;' ^-'II iI 1:-_____________________________ _ _______II_ 'ommittee'i I:"I1-1. ,/: _ --1__: .: I :Dr. UW-Madison——WAGNIClCranberry—Website -Library I:Teryl Roper a n WCB ^~~~~~~~~~~~ W\-^______________,i sconsin Cranberr Cro Mana ement Newsletter WOB &'D/--^&r.Frank Caruso Cranberry1 lill^M ______II Leaf Trash____________W '^U-I.IIDr.TWs-rosI DesCabr Juice Iitl Clotting? WCB .I^I^~ 1 I^-:-l;^ I~ : ~ I:: I~~I~ ~IiI Cranberries1 999I page 19 ~~~~~II :~~I:]I:~ . Table 6. PesticideRegistration Name. Affiliation Project Title Funded by Dr.Jerry Bamrong Offie ofR4fVBthe *QualitymAssurance S BCResidue TrialsM tdfor roPokeciNRei I00 :rs.ViLtoria Broorbies AA BC Residie Tris oer GA8 a55r4and R 28 C r eMDeFrances OSU 4 Rei rO est InR WSCPR Dept.of Agricultueg & oSf Ta eth o Dr.Darve Fusa.·OU Ma me foe terBalu (Cana.d ~Drt. Physiog, Cd Irrigation Method rdinessd NamenDaPrtaTitle Afilation Funded b WitrPrtection of & Mr. Sid Look GrCranberies inMadine Grower Grant Dr. Marshall English Cofficints for cranberrie ln O o M.Charles Armtrn U Of Main Alternative to Flodin fo he NE Region SARE *An OSU Irationd Mardnaem Dr.0Brucefs FlugstaOSU * Impnageroved Methd 0 OSC for terminig Thtal Wter Balance · Uing B ement Ctran to Aids in Iition Mana Dr. Bruc Lampinen U~s-mes s f Sanding Combined with Gibbe~relli to Alte CCCGA &IOSC Crop~Load in Cranberr Phsiolgica andHoricutua~ Re,sponses of Cranberr QCCCGA & OSC to ns ingFerlizatisonndIrationgMthod imDevelopment Of Eatrnspirtion Dta and Crop CCCGA Coefficints for Cranberr l Dr. Jiwian aata UW-Maio *Tlrance of Cra~nbery~PlntoLwTmeau: WB DevelopIng a Model for predicting seasonalChangesin phenology and Cold hardinessof the cranberry Plantto manageCrop for frost Protection *Using NaualLpist Accelerate Ripening WCB (uiorm color development)and Promote Shelf Life Of Crnberres: In season (tartin at flwern)apctino improve fruit health and ieeldi *Develop WMoe for Predictin Seasonal Chane i SC Phenology and 'ColdHadnSs of Cranberr Plant to Mana eCr for Frost Protection Drs. JAn ta UW-Madison
Object Description
Title | Cranberries - The National Cranberry Magazine, 1999-06 |
Subject | Cranberries - The Magazine; |
Type | Text |
Format | image/pdf; |
Identifier | 9906CRAN.pdf |
Rights | 2008 Wetherby Cranberry Library; |
Submitting Institution | Wetherby Cranberry Library; |
Date Digitized | 2000-11-16 |
Coverage-Spatial | Massachusetts; New Jersey; Wisconsin; Oregon; Washington; Canada |
Coverage-Temporal | 1990-1999; |
Creator | Bob Taylor; Carolyn Gilmore; Carolyn Laban; Irving Demoranville; Phillip E. Marucci; Elizabeth G. Carpenter; I. V. Hall; Arthur Poole; Azmi Y. Shawa, Tod D. Planer; Dan Brockman; Joan E. Humphrey |
Date | 1999-06 |
Date Last Updated | 2008-11-10 |
Language | English |
Relation | Cranberries - The National Cranberry Magazine |
Description | The magazine entitled, “Cranberries – The National Cranberry Magazine,” describes grower information, regional news, and developments in the cranberry industry in the United States and Canada. |
Format-Medium | Magazine; |
Publisher | Carolyn Gilmore |
Digitizer | Stosh Jonjak |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Description | For more photographs like this one, visit the Cranberry Library Photostream on Flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cranberrylibrary/sets/ |
Transcript | Since 193619;60 SEt0000000000000000 UtiUAti Ui0000000020000iig0000000000tti~i00kE; iE; fi E :00:t 0 :Xf:f t: S0000;; ;;00 0:00000:0:::0; ::00;:X: ti~iE~00iiiiW~~;l0SgXt0E0ffit~0tV000i00gStfXW400i: 1 El0000tii~i000ii00jl4004ifii~t:V0f;0iii~ti0004i000:ii:EiiiR ~Ei E :i EiL::::E:EI tEXtXlt4WQ0~ E:fi EE: ii ::i tiidEtft~fiFt00t~iXt:t0;iXi~gtfi04t000i00 /iiXtfttftfi0iii 00 i0t00tiiE EE00ift~dt000 ftFi04i4004 ii0ig04ft00 ~i I004t000 p~SEiit iC;fQ:i~ Ei:ii0fi::Si~~Eitt:iS;iEEiiiiSdiSiXT:i~CEi~iiSSii~~ii EEiidiEi~: !ii: :!iQ: Eii :iSiiiiiii Specializing in B A T O 'S CRANBERRY GROWERS SERVICE COMPLETE BOG * NETTING MANAGEMENT 0 DITCHING * @S)CUSTOM * * DITCHING HERBICIDE · SANDING APPLICATION * WPS TRAINING EkHAM, gIo * HARVESTING * BIOVECTOR (WET & DRY) NEMATODE DISTRIBUTOR Office D. Beaton P. Beaton M. Beaton (508) 295-2222 (508) 888-1288 (508) 947-3601 (508) 833-0172 Complete line of portable Crisafulli Pumps 2" -16 " M»INS Plastic netting for suction boxes lS R.A.S.P. INC. Carrying a Complete Line of: * Cranberry Chemicals and Fertilizers * Frost Alarms Thermometers * Chemical Application Equipment * Pesticide Container Recycling Program (call for details) * Kubota K-35/K41 Rental Contact: Phone: Bob or Mike (508) 866-4429 3 Plymouth St. Fax: Carver, MA 02330 (508) 866-5654 Some Bigger, None Better A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i 'Versaie easy-to-use man ocide® ishe EssnilFngiid for many veetabl programns. Its dual mode-of-action combines Mancozeb and Kocide® to mximize botht fungal and bacterial disease control, whi~leinimizing -the potential of: resistance development. MainKocide w~ets instantly suspends quickly an sty isupnsion wtmiima agitation. Spray-dried ManKocide can be conveniently mixed w~ith foliar applied fungicids inetcde ad most foliar nutrients.1 . or more iforation, askyur consultant,or chemnical Alas ed n Makciean olo oid lbl ietin 0 9 rergstrd rdim1s aio.2080 FeGriffinmGriS f pp i;;s orcallbih LLC Va37ld8 LETTERS ARE WELCOME. SEND CORRESPONDENCE TO: anbelUVrries | CRANBERRIES Since 1936 June 1999 Vol. 63 No. 5 EQUIPMENT 6 The Sandman's New Season A gantry system extends the sanding months. TRIBUTE 8 Carl Wendell Johnson, a Grower's Grower He had boundless enthusiasm for cranberries. RESEAR CH 10 Fruit Rot Studies in Massachusetts, 1998 by Frank L. Caruso Investigation include registered fungicides, compost teas and experimental fungicides. PEST CONTROL 14 CONFIRM: A Breakthrough in Caterpillar Control by Donald C.Weber The first new regular cranberry insecticide in a decade debuts for use in all regions this season. RESEARCH 16 1999 Projects Address Immediate and Long-term Needs by Gary Deziel Some of agriculture's best scientists are in our camp. Here is what they are up to. Nova Scotia 25 A Joint Adventure in the Atlantic Provinces CORPORATE 26 Northland Segues into Dilute Juice Blends 29 Decas Cranberry Products Adds Sales Manager Cover: Blossoms on Stevens vines grown by John Shurtleff of Middleboro, Mass. promise a fabulous crop. (Cranberries photo.) P.O. Box 190 ROCHESTER, MA 02770-0190 Editor & Publisher Carolyn C.Gilmore Tel: (508) 763-8080 Fax: (508) 763-4141 e-mail: cranberries @mediaone.net CONSULTANTS Massachusetts Dr. Thomas Bewick, Director Cranberry Experiment Station, East Wareham New Jersey Dr. Nicholi Vorsa, Director, Blueberry/ Cranberry Research Center, Chatsworth o Oregon Arthur Poole, Coos Co. Extension Agent, Coquille Washington Dr. Kim Patten, Associate Horticulturist, Coastal Washington Research & Extension, Long Beach Wisconsin Tod Planer, Wood Co. Ag. Agent; Teryl Roper, UWEX, Madison orresondents Patricia Carroll, Corvallis, OR Suzen Ziegahn, Wisc. Rapids, Wi CRANBERRIES, (USPS No. 136-620) is 11 times annually (onthly, a combined Dec./Jan. issue) by Carolyn C. Gilmore, at 670 Neck Rd., Rochester, MA 02770. Periodicals Postage is paid at the Rochester, MA Post Office and additional offices. Price is$25 a year; $45 for two years, $3 a copy; $30US a year in Canada payable RANpublished except on a US draft; $35US on a US draft per year in all countries.o Back copies: $3.50. ther in all other countries. Back copies: $3.50. Copyright 1998 by Cranberries. ISSN: 0011-0787 Postmaster, send form 3749 to: Cranberries, P.O. Box 190 Rochester, MA 02770-0190 Loam, Sand & Gravel Quantities of 500 yards and up inSoutheastern Massachusetts. Will dig bog to rough grade. T I TVl g~ Sam White & Sons Sand & Gravel Particles swell to 30 times their size when wet and hold 300 to M f MA 400 times their Medfield, IA weight in water. For use in new bog construction or791 when rebuilding. 508 350-71 For all your growing needs. R.E.Morse & Son, Inc. . supplying agricultural chemicals, fertilizer and power equipment ' .F. 5" -^ -'• :\ C RANBERR HIGHWAY MASSACHUSETTS 02576 Y WESTWAREHAM, 6S I(508) 295-1553 The Sandman's New Season 've: eX ....... Middleboro, Mass. -No one was more surprised than grower Peter Pi!,iI ":~i : Paquin .... himself that his 160 foot gantry sander works as well as it does. With the kind of spreader used on highway sanders, traveling along a gantry track by a system of cables, he found a way to extend the sanding season to over five months long -post harvest through December and February through April. Inspired by Atoka Cranberries in Quebec, this bridge sander was an on and off project for Paquin for about five years. When he finally finished it and tried it out, the results amazed him. This season the sander covered ".~~'f~{ about 100 acres of bog with 100-110 .... yards per acre. He moved it along five Photos, top. Peter Paquin, left, and his son, Barry, find their new home built sander gives them : months of sanding ...' : -. time. · 'i- Bottom, Paquin's . sander casts sand as. it is being loaded. A system of pulleys lifts the gantry and ... its legs off the bog when it is time to move ahead. The long extension is .. counterbalanced by .. nine tons at the loading end. (Cranberriesphotos.) =':~. page 6 June 1999 Cranberries Organic rtiizer Prod uc t A careful solution to today's environmental concerns. "I have always made it apolicy in life to identify successful people in any particularendeavor,ask theiradvice andthenfollow it... the growers who recommended KellyGreen to me are using it themselves, are experiencing yearly increases in productionand have yields my grandfathercould've only dreamedpossible when he planted ourfirst bogs. So, now I'm a life long customer and enthusiasticsupporterof KellyGreen." Robert Hawkins Bandon, Oregon June 25, 1998 KellyGreenT Fresh Fish Fertilizer Fish is an ancient and trusted nutrient. The benefits of using fish to fertilize crops have been known and appreciated since the beginning of agricultural history. It has not been widely used for two important reasons, disagreeableodor and lack of availabilitybeyond coastal areas. KellyGreenM has mitigatedthe effect of these two excuses. KellyGreenTM offers an exciting solution to the challenges of today, and to the hopes for a better tomorrow. Call for distributor and product information, or visit our web site at www.kellygreen.net Global Recycling & Research, Inc. 1000 Hilton Avenue Bellingham, WA 98225 888-676-7844 Fax: 360-676-8692 www.kellygreen.net Carl Wendell Johnson, a Grower's Grower He gave his communitya legacy of horticulturalwisdom. South Carver, MA -Most ei. oso' He had an affinity for growers in South Carver, this younger generatins, and took "cranberry capital" town of .itime and interest with those Massachusetts, had never ... coming up through the ranks known a frost season beforet in the cranberry community. this year that Carl Wendell South Carver grower, Gary Johnson was not on the bogs. Garretson recalled learning Hi bogs sand many others. from the master in the early grower relationsmdepar a lif 1980s. "Carl was doing most etable and flowerygardensan usngearl This remarkableman,tment.a life With etime'seexperience ~in. o watas, dnandtook long grower and horticulturist, of the horticultural guidance had boundless enthusiasm for on the bogs at the time and I growing cranberries, and attached myself to him so I mentored many area growers could learn as much as I could while caring for hundreds of about the nature of my acres right into his 85th year. grandfather's bogs" he said. Many regarded him as essen-"Nothing like being out for a tial to the South Carver cran-] few frost nights and then put- berry community right up un-ting on sprays for the next few til the time of his death on and then working all day to March 20th this year. prove your mettle with this "Even at 85 he was always gii_ a1, a " on wase s ad keeping up with this man who willing to try something new man. I honsty had-troubl the ays on the bog" said Nancy Kai-Carl Wendell Johnson, with booms ready to move to the was 35 years my senor. onptheabg "e8aid Nancy Kai-next bog during the 1998 harvest. ser, Johnson's niece, who is a nextbogduring the 1998 harvest. A lifelong farmer, Johnson supervisor in Ocean Spray's also lovingly tended his veg- grower relations department. With a lifetime's experience in etable and flower gardens and raised farm animals. He had an growing cranberries, he still tried new varieties, embraced IPM uncanny ability to grow zinnias with blooms up to eight inches and experimented with cultural practices. across. "He made it look so easy" Garretson said. "He was al- He had been married to Elsie (Carlson) Johnson for 58 ways fussing with some new concoction that would get them years. Born in South Carver, the son of the late Alex and Hulda to be bigger and better just like he would his cranberries." Maria Narhe Johnson, he lived in the same house all his life. His two oldest sons, David and Douglas, have followed in He was educated in the Carver schools. his footsteps to also become cranberry growers. Johnson was an Ocean Spray member and served on the He was buried in the Centre Cemetery, Wareham, Mass. advisory committee, plus he was a member of the Cape Cod Memorial donations may be sent to Jordon Hospital, 275 Cranberry Growers' Association. He was also one of the char-Sandwich St., Plymouth, MA 02360 or American Cancer Soter members of the Carver Sportsmen's Club, and a life mem-ciety, 1115 W. Chestnut St., Suite 302, Brockton, MA 02401. ber of the Middleboro Elks. He was a member of the United O' Parish of Carver. page8 June 1999 Cranberries IRRIGATION / SNOWMAKING l P.O. Box 66, 11 Larchmont Lane, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 Irrigation Equipment Designed Especially for the Cranberry Industry LARCHMONT is the New England Distributor for PACO Irrigation Pumps. These pumps, in most cases, are more efficient than most other brands. Pumps are available in electric, close coupled, or long coupled with SAE housing for engine mount. Larchmont will mount to engines of your choice. Example: PACO Pump: 6 x 8 x11 2000 GPM @ 140'TDH is 88% efficient and requires only 80HP at design point. This can be mounted on a Chevrolet 350 LPG engine. PACO Pump: 8 x1 0 x12 3000 GPM @ 140'TDH is 90% efficient. This can be mounted to a Chevrolet 454 LPG engine. Not only does the higher efficiency offer a saving in original cost by being capable of using a smaller engine but also your fuel consumption per gallon pumped is less. PACO has added to its Irrigation Line, a FOOD HANDLING Helixal Port Impeller Pump suitable to the Cranberry Industry. These units are available in 3", 4" and 6" suction and discharge sizes. LARCHMONT's complete inventory of irrigation accessories includes: PIPE -All sizes & types, 1/4" to 12" PUMPS -Berkeley -Cornell -Gorman -Rupp -Gould -Myers -Electric -Engine Drivers LOW LIFT PUMPS SPRINKLERS -Rainbird -Nelson -Weather Tec -Western -Brass Impact Sprinklers WEBSTER QUICK COUPLERS with RISERS -Proven! I i For information or quotes on any pump or irrigation product, call Joe or Phil at! LARCHMONT, collect, (781) 862-2550, or fax to: (781) 862-0173. Fruit Rot Studies in Massachusetts, 1998 by Frank L.Caruso Cranberry Experiment Station University of Massachusetts, East Wareham rT he following studies performed during the 1998 Screen of presently registered fungicides growing season will be discussed in this article: (1) and compost teas Screen of presently registered fungicides and compost The registrants of the chlorothalonil formulations (Bravo teas, and (2) Screen of experimental fungicides. Materials ex-Weatherstik and Terranil 6L in this study) are considering lowamined in the latter study were part of the National Fungicide ering the maximum rate of the fungicide because of the "risk Screening Program coordinated by Gary Deziel at the Cran-cup" concept in relation to the Food Quality Protection Act. berry Institute wherein some of the materials were also tested Consequently, these two formulations were examined at the in New Jersey, Wisconsin and Washington. The data presented 5.5 pints/acre rate as well as the minimum rate of 4 pints/acre. here and their conclusions are most appropriate for Massa-The spreader-sticker Plex was included with the 4 pint rate of chusetts and New Jersey where fruit rot is a problem every Terranil 6L. Other registered fungicides examined included year and where the fungal pathogens are very similar. How-Kocide 2000, Manex II and Mankocide. Also, a schedule of Bravo ever, the results and conclusions may also be Table 1.Study ofregistered fungicidesand compost teas -fruitset and rot -1998. useful to a certain degree in other growing ar-Treatment/rate Fruit set August Harvest Eight week eas where fruit rot has field rot field rot storage rot increased in its incidence during the past Bravo Weatherstik-4 pt 58.0 a 5.4 de 13.1 de 5.8 b two years. Terranil 6L -4 pt 53.0 a 5.6 de 13.7 cde 6.4 b Fungicides that are egistered agaist fruit Terranil 6L + Plex -4 pt/.125% 54.4 a 6.1 de 10.6 de 5.7 b registered against fruit rot are designated by Bravo Weatherstik-5.5 pt 54.0 a 5.9 de 5.6 e 4.2 b their trade names. Un-Terranil 6L -5.5 pt 55.3 a 3.8 e 5.9 e 4.8 b registered materials are Kocide 2000-6 lb 53.6 a 25.5 c 66.8 b 12.1 ab referred to as a particu-Manex II -3.6 qt 58.2 a 6.2 de 18.7 cde 7.4 b lar product. No endorse-Mankocide -10.67 lb 53.9 a 11.8 d 21.7 cd 7.2 b ment of any of the reg-Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt 54.0 a 10.5 d 24.8 c 10.2 ab istered materials is im--3 Manex II-3.6 qt plied by the discussion Kocde 2000 -6 lb of the results. All rates are expressed as product Cranberry/horse manure (not active ingredient) compost tea 53.9 a 38.2 b 65.2 b 14.9 ab per acre. Anyone who UMass cafeteria feedstock desires further informa-compost tea 58.2 a 44.2 ab 81.9 a 14.3 ab tion ordetails on the tri-Untreatedcontrol 60.5 a 54.4 a 85.7 a 16.7 a als should contact the _ author. Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 page 10 June 1999 Cranberries Weatherstik, Manex II and Kocide 2000 was investigated, In late April, I attended a week-long Compost School at the University of Maine, where I learned about all aspects of compost and its benefits. One of the most interesting things I learned about was compost teas and their use in the control of certain plant diseases. A compost tea is essentially a water extract of nearly mature compost that includes organic acids and phenolic compounds from the plant materials plus antibiotics produced by many of the microorganisms involved in the breakdown of the organic material. These chemicals are sup- pressive to the fungus Phytophthorainfestans which causes late blight in potato, and the soil-borne fungi Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia which cause root rot of numerous plants. Be- cause foliar applications significantly reduced the incidence of potato late blight, I thought it was worth trying out com- post teas for the control of fruit rot. Two composts were obtained for the study. Compost was obtained from piles maintained Decas Cranberries that con- sist of cranberry leaf and fruit trash from both individual bog water harvest operations and from the two receiving stations (dry and water harvest deliveries) plus horse stable bedding (manure and hay). Compost was also obtained from piles main- tained by the Physical Plant at the University of Massachu- setts, Amherst that consisted of refuse from the cafeterias on campus plus other materials. The teas were made by steeping one gallon of the compost in four gallons water for one week, mixing daily, and filtering them through several layers of cheesecloth prior to their use. These teas were applied on the same schedule as the other fungicides. Plots were established in the cultivar Early Black in one of the sections of State Bog. Three sprays of each material were applied on: JUNE 6 (8% BLOOM) JUNE 17 (70% BLOOM, 5% FRUIT SET) JUNE 29 (100% BLOOM, 50% FRUIT SET) Each treatment was replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design in 25 ft2 plots. Sprays were applied using a CO2 backpack sprayer with one flat fan nozzle at a pressure of 40 psi. The compost teas were applied using a Solo backpack sprayer with a similar nozzle at a pressure of 30 psi. A preliminary assessment of field rot and fruit set was performed on August 20 by selecting 20 uprights per replicate and counting the number of pedicels, the number of fruit, and the number of rotted fruit. Berries were hand-picked from a 4 ft2 area in the center of each replicate on September 8-10, counted and evaluated for the presence or absence of field rot at five days after harvest. Sound berries were sorted and stored at 38"F for eight weeks. Standard cup counts and 100 berries were weighed to determine whether the treatments had any effect on berry size. Separate samples were taken for color analysis to determine whether any treatments had a deleterious effect on anthocyanin production. After eight weeks, berries were evaluated for storage rot by sorting out rot a second time. The data are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Bravo Weatherstik and Terranil Table 2. Study ofregistered fungicidesand compostteas -6L were compared for their efficacy berry at the lowest registered rate (4 pt) size and weight -1998 and the rate (5.5 pt) commonly Treatment/ra Mean cupWeightused by growers. Both Treatment/rate Bravo Weatherstik -4 pt Terranil 6L -4 pt113.0 -pt Terranil 6 L + Plex -4 pt/.125% Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt Terranil 6L -5.5 pt Kocide 2000-6 lb Manex II -3.6 qt Mankocide -10.67 lb Bravo Weatherstik -5.5 pt Manex II -3.6 qt Kocide 2000 -6 lb ~~~~~Koci~~~~~~~de 2000-~6 l~bcontrol of both field rot and stor- Cranberry/horse manure 109.7 b 85.7 ab 0.87 ab cro bt i t a sto age rot, but it was inferior to the compost tea two chlorothalonil fungicides. Poor UMass cafeteria feedstock 113.7 b 74.5 c 0.75 c control of both rots resulted when compost tea Kocide 2000 was utilized; this fun- Untreated control 134.0 a 80.2 be 0.80 be gicide should not be used as the sole fungicide where fruit rot incidence Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 is histocally high in a particular Cranberries June 1999 page 11 Mean cup Weight (g) Mean berry chlorothalonil formulations afcount 100 berries weight (g) forded excellent control of both field rot and storage rot at the 5.5 114.7 ab 91.4 a 0.91 a pt rate. Field rot incidence in- b 92.5 a 0.93 a creased when the rate was reduced 113.0 b 92.5 a 0.93 a 107.6 b 95.0 a 0.95 a to 4 pt, but storage rot incidence only increased slightly. The addi 115.2 ab 90.9 a 0.91 a er Plex to tion of the spreader-sticker Plex to 114.6 ab 91.2 a 0.91 a Terranil resulted in a slightly re127.1 ab 81.5 ab 0.82 ab duced incidence of field rot. This 116.7 ab 90.4 ab 0.90 ab further supports previous work that 122.0 ab 89.3 ab 0.89 ab indicates that these additives are 122.7 ab 87.3 ab 0.87 ab probably not needed with the chlorothalonil fungicides. Manex II and Mankocide gave acceptable bed. The Bravo/ Table 3. Study of experimental fungicides-fruit set and rot -1998 i Manex/Kocide fungi- Fruit set August Harvest Eightweekcide schedule did not Treatment/rate/%/ bloom rot rot field rot storagfield result in acceptableield rot control, probably because the third fun-Product A -4 oz (15%) 58.3 a 6.8 ab 33.3 d 12.2 b gicide was Kocide and Product A + Latron B1956 -4 oz (15%) 56.2 a 8.5 ab 25.4 cd 9.3 b infections during the Product B-0.3 lb (15%) 58.3 a 10.1 b 30.9 d 10.5 b latter portion of Product B + Latron B1956 -0.3 lb (15%) 60.2 a 14.4 b 34.2 d 11.2 b abloom in Product C bloom resulted in el-12.8 oz (15%) 59.7 a 7.0 ab 11.7 bc 5.9 ab evated levels of rot in Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (15%) 58.8 a 10.3 b 10.2 b 6.7 ab the field and in stor- Product C + Latron B1956-12.8 oz (40%) 59.3a 8.6ab 12.0bc 5.6ab age. The compost tea from the UMass caf-Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (60%)1 57.2 a 11.2 b 8.7 ab 5.5 ab eterias had no appre-Untreated control 56.8 a 43.9 c 77.1 e 18.4 c ciable effect on either rot. However, the Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 compost tea from the cranberry/horse manure signifi-Table 4. Study of experimental fungicides-berry size and weight -1998 cantly reduced field rot compared to the other compost tea Treatment/rate/% bloom Mean cup Weight Mean berry and the untreated control. It count 100 berries weight (g) certainly did not result in acceptable rot control. However, Product A-4 oz (15%) 106.3 ab 95.5 ab 0.96 ab the compost piles had not been Product A + Latron B1956 -4 oz (15%) 103.1 b 98.8 a 0.99 a turned on a regular basis and Product B -0.3 lb (15%) 110.4 ab 93.4 ab 0.93 ab consequently, the cranberry | Product B + Latron B1956 -0.3 lb (15%) 111.7 ab 92.0 b 0.92 b compost was probably not at the Product. C -12.8 oz (15%) 106.3 ab 95.3 ab 0.95 ab maturity necessary for the best 12.8 oz (15%) 114.4 a 92.1 b 0.92 b maturity necessary for the best Product C + Latron B1956 There were no deleterious Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (40%) 108.0 ab 94.2 ab 0.94 ab effects by any of the treatments Product C + Latron B1956 -12.8 oz (60%) 106.8 ab 94.7 ab 0.95 ab on fruit set, berry size, or berry Untreated control 114.3 a 84.3 c 0.84 c weight. Three applications of Manex II significantly reduced Means followed by a different letter are significantly different, Student-Newman-Keuls Test, p=0.05 the color of berries (data not shown) compared to the other treatments. Surprisingly, both Bravo and Terranil also had a (1) JUNE (15% BLOOM), JUNE 19 (80% BLOOM, 10% deleterious effect on color development. This effect has never FRUIT SET), AND JULY 1 (100% BLOOM, 65% FRUIT SET) been observed for the chlorothaloni-fungicides. (2) JUNE 12 (40% BLOOM), JUNE 22 (90% BLOOM, 15% FRUIT SET), AND JULY 2 (100% BLOOM, Screen of experimental fungicides 70% FRUIT SET) These trials were conducted in plots that were adjacent to J 25 (9% BLOOM, 25% the first study (Early Black). Plots were established in similar (3) ( 160% ), JUNE 2 BLOOM, SET) JNE L (% fashion to the other study. Product A showed good potential in the 1997 trials; it was reported as Product #2 (Cranberries, Materials were applied similarly to the other study. A pre- June 1998 issue). Product C did not perform as well in the l a evaluation of fie d fruit set was performed on 1997 trials, but it was suspected that it would perform better liminary evaluation d on September 7-21 and of fiel in the presence of an adjuvant (reported as Product #3 in the A 1 uguserres as descried previousl. The dat wn were a above art. all procedures were as described previously. The data are shown above article). Product B is in the same chemical group as . Product C; both of these materials were tested with and with-Regardless of the timing of the first application, the best out the addition of an adjuvant. The adjuvant used in all treat-rlof both field and storage rot were obtained by the Prodments was Latron B,1956 at a concentration of 0.06%. Prod-control of both field and storage rot were obtained by the Prodments was cpLatron B1956 at a concentration te 0.06f . Prod-uct C treatments. It performed better than Product B of simiuct C was compared on three schedules with the first applica-lar chemistry and Product A that did not fare as well as it did tion at either 15% (utilized also for Products A and B),. . 40%1 Iin 1997. The addition of the ' l ado P odc adjuvant did not enhance the or 6 0%. The three schedules employed were: page 12 June 1999 Cranberries efficacy of any of the three materials. Interestingly, the best fruit rot control was achieved by the application of Product C initially at 60% bloom (although not statistically significant). Berries treated with Product the largest, heavi- A were est and had the best color (data not shown), although not statistically differ- ent from the other treatments. There were no deleterious effects caused by any of the treatments. Research will likely be continued with both Products A and C in 1999. Acknowledgments These trials could not have been con- ducted without financial assistance from Griffin Corporation, Rohm & Haas Com- pany, Terra, and Zeneca Ag Products. I wish to thank Jane Mika, Peter Larsen, and Kate Muldoon for their assistance throughout the various phases of the research, David Nolte (Decas Cranberries, Inc.) and Dr. Steven Goodwin (Department of Micro- biology, UMass, Amherst) for the corn- posts, and Gary Deziel (Cranberry Insti- tute) for his coordination of the national cranberry fungicide screening project. AA DA RL JI i /l IilliIlil I l 1wl~0l% V 4 l Farm Credit am re The first choice of ag businesses. \ C AO Everyone likes choices That's why, more Everyone likes choices. That's why, more than ever, business-wise cranberry growers turn to Farm Credit for real estate mortgages, short or intermediate term loans and other financial services. We work one-on-one with you to find solutions that are right for your business. Our rates are competitive, and you will receive the kind of personal service you expect from an organization whose only business isagricultural finance and service. Business-wise farmers like Farm Credit's choices and personal service. What about you? Examineourchoices.Comparethemwith any bank's. Then give us a call. First Pioneer Farm Credit, AC.A. 67 Bedford St., PO.Box 720 Middleboro, MA 02346-0720 (508) 946-4455 Farm Credit Services P.O. Box 369 Sparta, Wl 54656 1-800-236-3148 G.A.F. Engineering Inc. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WATERFRONT & COASTAL ENGINEERING REGULATORY COMPLIANCE D.E.P. WETLAND FILINGS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITS WATERWAYS LICENSES E.P.A. PERMITS ~LEGAL G EARTH REMOVAL PERMITS ENGINEERING ,~ LAND SURVEYING PLOT PLANS PERIMETER SURVEYS LAND COURT PLANS CONSTRUCTION STAKING CONSTRUCTION STAKING ~~~~DESCRIPTIONS WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PERMITS CRANBERRY BOG DESIGN COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING TEL: (508) 748-0252 454 WAREHAM STREET *P.O. Box 953 *MARION, MA 02738 FAX: (508) 748-0542 Cranberries June 1999 page 13 OUR AD ISN'T THE BIGGEST BUT IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE SUPPLIES, CRANBERRY EQUIPMENT ENGINEERED DESIGNS AND PROMPT SERVICE WORK. STEARNS IRRIGATION, INC. * 790 FEDERAL FURNACE ROAD * PLYMOUTH, MA 02360 PHONE: (508) 746-6048 * FAX: (508) 747-3086 CALL US TOLL FREE: 1-888-899-4225 ..ESTATE PLANNING... .. ATEAM EFFORT t may take the combined efforts of your attorney, accountant, tax professional and your insurance agent to help you create your plan. But a member agent of The Nautitus (Groutpcan bring more to the table. Members have access to a professional staff with specialties in law, taxation, accounting and insurance to provide strategies in Estate Conservation and Business Succession for you and your professional advisors. for a free brochure and let us show you what teamwork is about. Bradford L. Meigs iMlnnbemAcfet 4 LA/ 800 Sou:th Street, Suite 6 10 Waltham, MNA0(2453 Phone: IFax: Fax. (781) 647-9200 (781)89-6r)i8AuS4an6(781) 899-4(])61 Ill O, ASohervic ofrThe.Y ' N ie onsur e Co.C CONFIRM: A Breakthrough inCaterpillar Control by Donald C. Weber Agricultural Science Group Ocean Spray Cranberries The first new regular US cranberry insecticide registration in ten years has been granted by the US federal EPA to tebufenozide (Confirm®2F), a selective insect growth regula- tor with broad activity against lepidopteran pests. The com- pound is a reduced-risk biorational safe for bees, birds, and fish, as well as handlers. The registrant, Rohm & Haas, will be issuing a label for rapid registration in the various cranberry- growing states. This new registration represents the fruit of the cranberry industry's pursuit of reduced-risk registration, and a real off- the-shelf technology for growers to use in 1999, at only slightly higher cost per acre than conventional insecticides. Partners in this effort include growers associations, Ocean Spray, the Cranberry Institute, Rutgers University, Washington State University, University of Massachusetts, Rohm & Haas, and the IR4 project. Analytic work as well as field trials for the Pacific North- west region were performed in Canada, in support of both US and Canadian registrations of Confirm. Registration is now pending in Canadian cranberries with an URMULE (User- Requested Minor-use Label Extension) request submitted by the Pacific Agricultural Research Centre of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Agassiz, British Columbia, to the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) in Ottawa. At a recent meeting in Ottawa, Minor Use Coordinator Douglas Rothwell expressed optimism that the URMULE would re- ceive rapid review, Tebufenozide, the active ingredient of Confirm®2F,mim- ics the action of the natural insect hormone 20- hydroxyecdysone, the physiological inducer of the molting and metamorphosis process in insects. Tebufenozide is an IGR insect growth regulator -because it regulates the molting pro- cess. More specifically, it is a MAC -molt accelerating com- pound. Tebufenozide controls lepidopterous larvae through a novel mode-of-action by the induction of a premature lethal molt which initiates within hours of ingestion of treated crop surfaces. The activity is primarily through ingestion, so that toxicity is dependent on the feeding behavior of the target pest, and thorough coverage of the treated plants. Unlike some Bt's, which are also stomach poisons, tebufenozide is more persistent on foliage, as long as it is allowed to dry on before rain or irrigation. When caterpillars ingest tebufenozide, actual death will take several days to occur although feeding by the insects generally ceases within 24 hours of ingestion. Tebufenozide is highly active against most lepidopterous larvae while having practically no activity at typical use-rates against other orders of insects. This selectivity allows for the conservation of beneficial and predatory insects which is a key element in suppression of most cranberry pests. Confirm performance has been excellent in several field trials against blackheaded fireworm. Sparganothislarvae are also very sensitive, although in the post-bloom fruit-feeding generation, growers and researchers are planning trials to determine optimum timing. The cutworm picture is promising, too. New Jersey aerial field trials against blossomworm and false armyworm, by Dan Schiffhauer of Ocean Spray and Sridhar Polavarapu of Rutgers, showed a drastic post-treatment decrease in both species. The material is effective on at least some spanworms, but more work is needed here. Gypsy moth is very susceptible, as shown by years of work in forestry. Confirm may or may not turn out to be a useful tool to manage cranberry fruitworm, because of the lack of contact activity. Except with blackheaded fireworm, more experience is needed with Confirm chemigation applications to define the efficacy of this application method. Despite some gaps in the efficacy picture, the proven efficacy of Confirm against several key lepidoptera should give it an important role in cranberry insect management in all regions. Growers are eager to put this breakthrough material to work, while researchers continue to test additional reduced- risk tactics. t Cranberries June 1999 page 15 1999 Projects Address Immediate and Long-term Needs by Gary Deziel, Manager Research and Communication, Cranberry Institute Commodity shines in research support When you scan the list of research projects in the follow- ing pages, what strikes you first? The number of projects? The range of topics? The number of sponsoring organizations? All of the above? Cranberry is a minor star in the North American agricul- tural universe by most measures (compared to corn, wheat and soybean, for instance, which are planted on nearly three-hun- dred million acres in the U.S. and Canada). But cranberry growers, handlers and associations outshine most commodi- ties when it comes to supporting agricultural research. The Wisconsin Cranberry Board (WCB), fueled by a 10 cent per barrel check-off and burgeoning production figures, is the biggest player in the commodity-based funding picture. The WCB funded twenty-five 1999 research projects to the tune of $233,000. Although lower in total funding, associa- tions and councils in New Jersey, British Columbia and Quebec also contribute at per-barrel levels similar to their Wisconsin brethren. Massachusetts, Oregon and Washington State all have active research programs as well. On the industry side of the ledger, Ocean Spray Cranber- ries, Inc. is a very significant research sponsor. Ocean Spray's Outside Research Grant Program, which is coordinated with ongoing in-house research and development, has funded more than thirty projects for the 1999 field season. The Cranberry Institute, supported by eight Supporting Members', continues to focus on reduced-risk pesticide evalu- ation and registration, pheromone-mediated mating disrup- tion of Sparganothis fruitworm and blackheaded fireworm, and biological control of pests. CI funding for 1999 is set at $159,800. Scientists make support work The commodity is also fortunate to have some of agriculture's best scientists in our camp. We have men and women working in concert with growers to crack the hardest nuts in cranberry production. There are researchers who are working on immediate commodity needs -such as conducting IR-4 residue trials to begin pesticide registration of new products. There are some working on mid-term needs -such as implementation of new insect control strategies, including pheromone-mediated mating disruption and biorational pesticides. And then there are others conducting experiments which poke at the edge of cranberry knowledge -including geographic information systems and varietal improvement. Many researchers have been very successful at receiving grant money from outside the commodity (see insert). These grants can be very competitive. They also tend to be in healthy portions and support long-term goals of sustainability. And bottom line -the grants make grower money go further. Funding agencies act in coordination All told Cranberry associations, councils and foundations provide approximately $400,000 for research. Ocean Spray and the Cranberry Institute funds, when combined, nearly match that amount. All that hard-earned cash is spent on high-pri ority research topics set by growers through committees like the Institute's Environmental Research Committee, the Wisconsin Cranberry Board and CCCGA's Research Committee. Research coordination, therefore, is very important -particularly to growers who want to be assured that no duplication is occurring between regions. Every penny is impor tant. This past winter an effort to better coordinate the research funding decision -making process was made by all the major funding organizations. While CI acted as the clearing house for research proposal information, proposal coordination could not have been done without the leadership provided by Joseph DeVerna, Ocean Spray Agricultural Research, Tom Lochner, WSGCA/Wisconsin Cranberry Board, Jeff LaFleur, Cape Cod Cranberry Growers Association and oth ers across the U.S. and Canada. Supporting members are: Les Canneberges Atoka, Inc., Cliffstar Corporation, Decas Cranberry Sales, Inc., Eagle River Cranberry Handlers, Hiller Cranberry Sales, Inc., Northland Cranberries, Inc., Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., and Oregon Cranberry Co. page 16 June 1999 Cranberries orted~~by marks..r~esearche.~~ such.~ Dr.A~sampling~~fr~.chides.Mic.r.. corn- I :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Outs~~~~~~of ing GreasesrcCrommodity'ls rhuned istdabevain fol ES. Ltd. ESC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cropconsult Masahset.Dprten f od..grcutre... MF Oregon Assocatio.OCG Cranberry Gr~~~~~~~~~~~~~aplitowers'.. Ou~~~~~~~~~becGrowers ..... QCGA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..... Association Cranberry .. ScienceColumbiaofBritish .......... SCBC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... Council United Departmentof Agriculture/Cooperative State Research Education & Extension ....Service USDA-CSREES~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... States ofMassachusetts UMD~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...... University -Dartmouth Agod&Agiculture,.h Wah tV ot'd^oucsS cnrbtosicdefdrl. rst .fMassac~husetts.rofatmno UW-PURR~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... Universityof Pesticide Use Risk Reduction Project Wisconsin . .USA.usaialeAgicltreReerc.&Edcaio.SR .. :'^''. ' -^ un mg-rga ^ '-^ ;'-^^---;-'-^^ '-^ -. -^-.-Abbrevviiao t iztio ^-'^ ':'! " -^!:l-~y^^:l:-ion'':^ Stat Comsin. nPsiid.eitato.SP WashingtonCranberry WSCC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.................... Washington~~~~~~~~~~~... State Commission .... WisconsinBoard WCB~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....... BC rabery:'Grwes'Association BCCGA-i' Jne199 ag 1 .... .. Cranberry~~~Canerie . .3 :. ^^^ CGA Funding f Cape ap-er ............Association an. of the Coa u.Itrowers' rC t proximatClean! $800C00nb cationsultsng efio ated mating disru pro-ifron:thesesouces ofcourse: remsub dif echnique AtocasQuebec which ha.ye wedntment T pestiCidAQs t c C$26.ry Bird Banding Project iyear dor comerciapote ran berry scie(.ns hranberry in ng a. g s f i Pov ca ns fd Ma"crane'rryre .': Cropconsult:.' ' Ltd.'-E.S.-ESC .. -—^..\.,^-'-'^;:—;j;:;. Institut de Recherche etoDeveloppement en Agroen-ironnement (Quebec) IexA er registration Interregional Research Project 4Numb(minor pesticide crop in the US) eR-4 Massachu CranberryResearchse tts Foundation -CRF nal Nat io Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada) NSERC Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. iOSCi' ^ a re gon f CGhtA Cranberry Growers'Associathon . uebecnCranberryeGrowersAssociation a QeA. yrla a SciencerC o unctl iS.e of BritishtColumbia .workUniteoSterms.highepr-.en. mAnagculte/Coopentaswe RedearctihnProd.catihousExdate side th~ aIUSDA-CSREES University of Massachusetts -Dartmouth UMD University of Wisconsin UW-PURR Pesticide Use Risk Reduction Project USDAiSusta inable Agr iculture Research Education SAyEg Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration WSCPR Washingt on WSCC State Cranberry Commission WisconsinCranberry Board AssoiatonWCC -: -:C manberry C page17l Cra:;! ' .: ':: -': "' : : : ^: ' --' -.::: ; ': : ' June 1999 I IIi I--l~~iiiil1-11-11 1'll-llllll~. 13!l :.i' -: I:I I::I -I-lli~liilliiiiiilll-lil'I.-Ill::I -I.~''Iff l !^: . ' : llii NamelAffiliationlPoiecItI TitleFundedIb I I ::·t:r~ --ll l...ll."I..-IIIIlegion-SARE^. ll ]..;l'1?. 3-;ef :..III-.: IC :.I&.,I. J: ::~I: :::. I Annejl ill.: .I.. : ~:: , II: I I I~II~B. :] OCGA :::~l:...-I :.I11"~"~l III. ~~. , ~ I angemntlf ranerr Wevi · :B: Cl&l Drl.lli Averilllill UlsslmhritliBolgylnd l:le I I -—1,I I:;,I -r--II ''. 11.-l.Ifl~I :-eIsev I C^G IIS03&.^Sp Connillj~li~llibslandiBlueberrylandiCranberr ieil Stui!lillB ^l~ I,-13ll u~tog I I -^i^:I^' ' '^~:"!X^-3I^.~'~:^~ I. .. -"I -II-"^ -1 ''~~~.~I -'^l~fl-^^^'P llll~~lliil~~liliil~oflBlakheaded Fireormin Britis Columbia OS !l tlnk: ~: : nle—::A M n and Bioonro of Micoi ^I'^llU::l'- II-llr ~nac Improvin i others I -gO...~i: ) I I !~i' .. ::s·~a~:~ ::,.I ~ . :mi : :.--i .:Il · tin l:t~: .11I~. ~is:: Cl, WCI ~~~ I I .1.I .Dr1. Da... MahrI I U-MaIso . * Implementation~ of:Mating Dirpion of Blackheaded ~ OSCI,~ USDA: II Ms.ISIel lee & ES En g l HI ::i BO ACECR&OSC3 Dtll~lr. ESC______Impllementlin.Biological__Control___of._Blackheaded_______CGA __&'::"-BC DeborahHenderson e:t:ci~ -:: ~·Bt IIIeIIa:i:s-&~nsiIIIn I ~ : s .. E~. .1o:I ..I II -II1. 1,I · :::~:: i : P :. II::: I.1. :.-1.IIII: I1III.ri]: v~: r : :-N:o:: l--I on. BartonMatsuoto~ass-— Grwe Gan ~1.s OrganticCranberryBogserrylitworm II-II.1, .I. III I-a:-P 1.111 j 1,:R u:] 1:lILIIf. IIsto.I .I. ...eI: I . I.II p aiI IPo -N: J. : .I I I I I : : tor.for Cranerry (NJSUIi Scoia IDr.:x::~::: : I-II: .. I-~:oi-na -an an Dr. Kenin Mac.renzrIe AMi a Pathogens ofI Pests AAFBCCAIn & Ms. Mi WC CQPA ofiseldon Ari .y USC .. t~ I.I JBC,:I .1,I&IWC ~~II ~::.I. of o IIIIII ::nt :::r. : :: :-I x. : d I-:"M :.: I.: ]]I : :~::I I ,~ :~ I I I-1o :: :-...I,' Dement ~ ~::: alnes } nistor ingset/Fun Manag in CraInbserr I ,l ::in:: I S ca: 11I 1 :I . I. II1I1 s I I. 1.1 , ~ 1 .. a: Of-S~:~: 1.I.I-i-tIhS~:. I :: 1rI CII, b r::I. ru.1. -:.III i111-:.M AP. A IIN SE . II ~..: .I~...-I . I ~.~aI.. ..I .1.. .1. ..IR i .,II.. 11.. Drs.Doug Patrogmn, St.MaryAsCUnivS ~.:I I ,..1 -. . I-I:I :·iY :lu ];;-::fII -1 I.an. :.-~:. I --I l ] : :T -I I. I I ..I: ~~ --~ : Mn I...I.D..I InsectII WSCCbw I Dr Kim Pate ~ ~: CecAppranber : i1 I . WSUI: ~ * C . I. e 1~I I :I::: :: 1. .I,. I tIIII-. CrIManberry Insneciie Aernatis & Trniti USDA-CS : -:II. :I C::::, 1.I1.I ,.~.II ,~.. Is. ..-.iIj .I I.. ..-.. 11I :I:r : ..I I II IV~II II I. (.I I. I . I .II~ I II ~ ~~ for the~tePaii NorthwestC~ll i~~~~~~~~~~~Srtge Dartmouth Be ~.I1. B onCrane ____________________ iNanbery havior of ogs Beds I, ~.."~. ~ ~ I~-~ :::~:. I~.-~~: . :~] I-: I~:: ::::~ ::II :1 I.. ; :: I-:II X:::~~~~~~~:~ :::::::I~;II . III.. :: i:. i II r: 1 : -. II-:II:: ::r;III:::II I ; IIII1 I:iI:--I ::I I-::::~~~~:,.----1. I ~ ~ ~ ~ I:X~~:~~:~: -::: ~ ~ ~ 111. I.11.11 ,.. -.I.-.-II .-.I: ' ..I-, I . I I I --I I-I 1. I I I I .I .: : 1 .-I I I: I III SACI RE I --I.. •CranberryPoIlnaetioneAtraivs^ rniio : '..I 9 -i-: :I -. ,--::: --I. :(:::;I ·-I:: :--. .. .: II :,: a.. I1 1-..::e . I..:.:I.:~]I 1I-1. , 1 I I'.I .I. ,. : -~ni I::: -r:II 1 -l-1I.-; .: : : :..II III :I. -:: :~_,1I, _::!:: :: of Populationdl NJCRC I Dr.K Sidhar PolavarapuRutge Ni*Saonal LokifestoryonOtimDvelopme Firwomtinisfonshaifino&rUW-PUR II iistem, :InsectII Dr.Brtonatsumto U ss-• ThveDstributions te fe^^ M 1I.~ II I I: I MneimatordIen e andManagement1IIo Si &OaaiisSfCaberCritwr nd RducedRisk Reoivna Sridhargraing ehaviralBioloical N SAREte Ij-.. '--:::/ :: : :' ;:: I:ntI-a I Bhvoa Bil gical-oandReduced-Ri... sk NE Reio- Dr. DavidhaMcavrthur RutofeBCs A ReducalLied-risk eticide BaedelonpPlnt Essenultial— CNJBCRCGA&ohr Drs.KimPatten,WSUtsofCranberr nsc est Mnagementr mleettin UDACRE i Natonal Workshopo r I~~arfm~~th~ ~ a~OptmaseoInctidl C&OS on theo Behvio of Honey Be on CranberryBreds Scargabswith sexPheromonesuI OCSCCA l &S C M 'Cont ofSoilrol I MrI.PaulkRobin Cornll emetR OCtNB R ,O C C • Ianvsiatioensof theaffetofhi Orutheneandent;yrn e I.-S M. MIch Roy w U IRDA · Cranb:erryfrutworm(Acrobasi vaccinii)nagem Cl, MAA:QNE . I~~~~~~~~~~o th Spin Cuwom andsSpanorm Comlex ::i''i~~n'MahriaDr·S UofMN _____• EtMnhagemnt ine CranbWCBCranberry__ S~~~~idhaT~ ~ MngmngtPcestsnofCrNberrIesecticiNewoSrganothispFruitwormJersey by'r C NJB & of theU ~Spri~ b O .Ms Monika Weldn C\SCC .* Cultura Coedi~~ntro of Spranti FriwrSCC 3 : g ~ ~ o Cranberriesf~e :~~~~~~~~~~~hog n~tO th Useof Floodingrhn~~? O~~ S page~18 Jun ~199 Cranberriess O Cnb~B~ i;^l::-;.^-.^3:':.^^ j '/:-'^3:-Pher__o aigDsuto -'-. moemdae n Cranberries______________________________: ~::,I1~~,1~: 1~~~1 I ~~~~~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ : I :: :,: ' ': ::I -I I :1: I : . I ,:I : 'I::I:: :: I :: ' ' :I::: 1;;I : II -:,, · I·:i _:, .: iiiiiiI- -"~~~~~·i-i-·i-~;i~:,a.11II ~ i.I~~ llll~llIilll: ~~::I~~~I~-lIIS-IIIIIISIIIIIIMlllllllllllIllllllill :::~ ~~1:~~i::;_i:::I~i~i : .~~I~ ~ ~,:::~: :~:~!~~I I aded NaMme~ A~;ffjliation I.Project Tite_.·. Fun`.· b I I _ _ I _ i iI ~] ]I.I.I :: _ I ~I ~I~II Y _II Enhancing The'rmalConditions in Cold-Watert ..1.. I--,,,:I1 .. 1.. .:e:: I: IN~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~1 Stream f ~~~~~~~f~~eceivin~ 11 .. -__-:i]I: :I: I:::: :II]:]I I]~~1~ l ::I :: ^l)lIIllIlIllII lltI ~II IS : ranberyIIBo W t Supp.IlesI Dr SkaynenupaU~ass-·Dartmoth*Adace Oiato Process~~r forRRemoal ofTrace :UMD : , 11 : : I ~~~~~~~~~~~t·S.T ~ ~1-~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. :: .: -: ~ ~~ ,eI-~:I.I I I I ~ ~~.. II. : -ro.1 .I I L::.kA.. I:: ltIati. ..-I I -: Tabi¹le 4 InterdisciSiaStuiesM ; _ IIh i]!I .:~ ~.111I:~~I ~:~~~:II~~riIwea-~Ii Ii ~:II f I.-.? "~~pm: ~I, r f.17Ie:: (1II1 I I( i I I ] I :I Drs-Iarolyn U ass-Amherst * Water Management of Cranberry COOGA~CI,QSC& ,SAREII Anne Aver & llllllhllllllllj~lll M'^1"ls.l lll Hilary Sandierl^ Teryl Roper I-I on Cranberry in Wisconsin II. .: . I I II.I I.1II ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ II :]d~i:II!g I: : m . "1Drs. :Pi"/illl^l -^^ Kim Patten^ -lWSU^ }; .& POQGIRFI IIi Pesticis.1 I 1:I1 Steve Booth 1 G irdlerUsingLow-lternative_______________ Mls. ;Caroline Turcotte—CETAQSeyan i op V 1..I.II11 .1.11 ...aIII I:tBSM Dvelopm enti Iandthe Identification of a French Guide for .sJo11-.: ____________oI inQ : .' I sanrd'Detectionoteai Insc t o Cranber -Drs.NlckVorsa, ' Rutgers *Cranberry & Bleerre in ises-C E :Ii -: I-1 I .-:; ; ~,^: ^ : '1~:II-': ^ -^ -:---' -I^I^ ' '-I--':I rner BlackiaioWevi II ::.rsan : ~ ~ --^V ^"~~~ l:I ::^ --• I. I-. '; ^ Dr.KmPte S nse Managem'en^'t os Vin an Crnery QOGAeb: ;• Peter Oudemana i ^ &;Sridhar Polavarapu.^. ^-'"^^^': •^^^:-^___________________________ :; Table MIscellaneousResearch IProects : IName' -. Affiliation^ :-.Project Ttle -i -'-; : -:-—; •hU!i:::-.: ::rFunde~d by; . .:.:/: - Dr. William Bland—UW-Madison—*Bog-Specific Temperature Forecast Calibration — WCB — Mr.Willlam Frantz OSOC*Sumay o 198PeticdeUs C Ms. Joanne Mason CCBBP * Osprey Anti-electrocution Program CO____COGA _______: & Cl Drs. Patty McManus, UW-Madison * uIad xes u r o xtninWB Dan Mahr Fruit Specialists . &'ITeryl RIoper I : " -: -I; •''. " . Dr. Peter Oudemans Rutgers * s fRmt esn oEtmt aito nNJBCRC &OSC _~~~~~~~fanoperaiv Sura e ________ __________________________Cranberry Yield and)'Development of a_____^_______________ Ground-Truthing System,; : Dr. Lee Estes UMD * Remote RadiometricCranberryBgSrs UMD .',.-.::l .1 ' ^^ :: , research Effor'.t________________I_________:_-____'I Mr. Arthur Poole —OSU — Bandon AgnrMetWeather Station Operation —G: O ::& Mr. Andy Broaddus OSCO ______ and Maintenance__________________________'\ : :: Dr. David Wang UW-Platteville * Engineering Modification of Boom Sprayers and the WCB -·r-'~~ 1:: : :: i. _ x enso gc ea er ag ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CE -,I ^____________________________________________;-.II- : ResearchII I I WSCGA1WSCGA * Crnberry Weath:erFo—-reat WVCB ::::' I'CC i-.. itteeI ' Iomm ' — · '' ' '::: --__________I___—I -] .I :: :;^^ 'WSCGA : WSCGA o I I ';l h^L.l: l-^!---dI WCB:' ^I -•I • !:-i: - 'II lPublic '-State Fair B ;-Relations CommIttee _________*Cranberry•Promotional DispIa s WC_________VB___________'^ . --WSCGA Education:-.W;SCGA *Bohr Pitn C . C ;' ^-'II iI 1:-_____________________________ _ _______II_ 'ommittee'i I:"I1-1. ,/: _ --1__: .: I :Dr. UW-Madison——WAGNIClCranberry—Website -Library I:Teryl Roper a n WCB ^~~~~~~~~~~~ W\-^______________,i sconsin Cranberr Cro Mana ement Newsletter WOB &'D/--^&r.Frank Caruso Cranberry1 lill^M ______II Leaf Trash____________W '^U-I.IIDr.TWs-rosI DesCabr Juice Iitl Clotting? WCB .I^I^~ 1 I^-:-l;^ I~ : ~ I:: I~~I~ ~IiI Cranberries1 999I page 19 ~~~~~II :~~I:]I:~ . Table 6. PesticideRegistration Name. Affiliation Project Title Funded by Dr.Jerry Bamrong Offie ofR4fVBthe *QualitymAssurance S BCResidue TrialsM tdfor roPokeciNRei I00 :rs.ViLtoria Broorbies AA BC Residie Tris oer GA8 a55r4and R 28 C r eMDeFrances OSU 4 Rei rO est InR WSCPR Dept.of Agricultueg & oSf Ta eth o Dr.Darve Fusa.·OU Ma me foe terBalu (Cana.d ~Drt. Physiog, Cd Irrigation Method rdinessd NamenDaPrtaTitle Afilation Funded b WitrPrtection of & Mr. Sid Look GrCranberies inMadine Grower Grant Dr. Marshall English Cofficints for cranberrie ln O o M.Charles Armtrn U Of Main Alternative to Flodin fo he NE Region SARE *An OSU Irationd Mardnaem Dr.0Brucefs FlugstaOSU * Impnageroved Methd 0 OSC for terminig Thtal Wter Balance · Uing B ement Ctran to Aids in Iition Mana Dr. Bruc Lampinen U~s-mes s f Sanding Combined with Gibbe~relli to Alte CCCGA &IOSC Crop~Load in Cranberr Phsiolgica andHoricutua~ Re,sponses of Cranberr QCCCGA & OSC to ns ingFerlizatisonndIrationgMthod imDevelopment Of Eatrnspirtion Dta and Crop CCCGA Coefficints for Cranberr l Dr. Jiwian aata UW-Maio *Tlrance of Cra~nbery~PlntoLwTmeau: WB DevelopIng a Model for predicting seasonalChangesin phenology and Cold hardinessof the cranberry Plantto manageCrop for frost Protection *Using NaualLpist Accelerate Ripening WCB (uiorm color development)and Promote Shelf Life Of Crnberres: In season (tartin at flwern)apctino improve fruit health and ieeldi *Develop WMoe for Predictin Seasonal Chane i SC Phenology and 'ColdHadnSs of Cranberr Plant to Mana eCr for Frost Protection Drs. JAn ta UW-Madison |
Digitizer | Stosh Jonjak |