page 31 |
Previous | 33 of 36 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
The Harvester World
31
material, less what the material was worth for scrap. This brought about a change. The men gradually began to look at the practical side of it. At the start they were simply trying to see how much they could do, regardless of quality; but after they found that they were the losers if the work was spoiled, they were careful then to see that the work was done in proper shape. We went on from year to year with the gradual growth and improvement of machinery and equipment, but the majority of the savings that were made were not made altogether with machinery that you could go in the market and buy. It every little while we get a serious one, and when we have a serious accident it brings up the ratio very rapidly. Every superintendent should study up on im¬ proved methods. Our works' burden is as much as the actual labor in many cases, whereas it could and should be reduced in many ways. Why does it come high? What can we do to reduce that burden. There are a number of ways in which it can be done. If we can cut out enough of the small extra expenses, the sum total will perhaps be larger than we think, but it is certain that we have to do something. When we look at the cost of our machines E was machinery that had been carefully studied out by men who were espe¬ cially adapted to study out ways and means of reducing hand labor and thus get out product for less money and with less men than by the old method. Then we came along to the time when we went entirely to steel machines. That meant quite a change in our machinery. It made it .necessary for us to in¬ vent maciiinery that we could not buy on the market. We had good designers, that could de¬ sign special machinery, special tools, etc., to do the work. And so it has gone on until today it is harder to reduce labor costs by new devices and methods than at the start. That, today, is one of the most serious things we have to contend with. I think every superintend¬ ent will agree that we can¬ not do it by reducing wages. Wages are prac¬ tically fixed; they are gradually increasing rath¬ er than decreasing. We must do it by other agen¬ cies. We have-to do it by imjiroved methods. The prices of materials have their ups and downs; just now they are up, and the cost of labor is up. We have reduced our working hours per week to fifty-five, which naturally adds to the costs. We are doing a good many things that increase overhead costs, such as welfare work, sanitary improvements, etc., in which we are.all inter¬ ested and which are right and proper and the thing to do and we hope to continue leading in them. We are also doing a great deal in safeguarding. In that particular line I think we not only get our money back but save life and limbs. Every time we put a guard on a machine it means that we get back the cost of installation many times over in the prevention of accidents. Many of them, of course, are trifling, but D B On the top B. A, Kennedy — taken in the eighties — and Robert H. Dixon, first Superintendent of Deerings. On the bottom B, A. Kennedy—taken fourteen years ago — and J. H. Pitkin the Veteran Husker and Shredder Authority. today, the prices they sell for, what it costs to sell them, and the small mar gin of profit that is left for us when we get through it is surprising. Now, the question is: What can each and every man sitting around this table tonight do to reduce thecost at his plant? Any¬ thing they can do, or think they can do, will be re¬ ceived with a great deal of pleasure at the main office—any suggestion of any kind. I think we should seriously think of tiiat until each one has brought upsomethingthat is going to help reduce our cost. As I said before, however, the principal thing is in metliods and ways of doing the work. If anyone thinks we can¬ not save anything today on manufacturing, over and above what we are doing now, as regards some particular phase of it or some particular piece of work that he is making, perhaps all he has to do is to sit down and study that piece a while and he will undoubtedly discover that he is not doing it as cheaply as he could. If he studies it carefully, he will find some way in which he can cut off a little bit of labor; and if we all work together, we can soon help to reduce the cost without affecting the quality. I realize it is a hard proposition, but it is a proposi tion we have to meet. It is a manufacturing depart¬ ment's proposition and superintendent's proposition; and of course the superintendents should have and do have men who will put their shoulder to the wheel, and help in every respect they can. When I think of the various things the International Harvester Company does for its employes it causes me to look back to the days when I first started in the shop, and think how little we had except hammering, from morning till night. We had none of the machines that
Object Description
Title | The Harvester World: Volume 4, number 3, March 1913 |
Object Type | Periodical |
Language | English |
Source | McCormick Mss 6z |
Electronic Publisher | Wisconsin Historical Society |
Physical Description | 7.25 x 10 inches |
Electronic Publication Date | 2008 |
Year | 1913 |
Volume | 004 |
Issue | 03 |
Date | 1913-03 |
Rights | © Copyright 2008 by the Wisconsin Historical Society (Madison, Wisconsin) |
Series | The Harvester World ; v. 4, no. 3 |
Format | TIF |
Description | Harvester World magazine was first published by International Harvester Company in October of 1909. From 1909 to 1946, Harvester World functioned primarily as an employee magazine, carrying news from various factories, branch houses and dealerships around the world. The magazine included biographical sketches of employees; notices of retirements and promotions; announcements regarding new company initiatives or building projects; and a variety of other news relating to nearly every facet of the company’s world wide operations. The magazine was published by the company’s Advertising Department, and also functioned as a way for headquarters to communicate with dealerships. In 1946, the magazine was redesigned and eventually shifted from an employee magazine to a more customer-oriented focus. By the 1950s, most Harvester Articles were human interest stories centering on the people and organizations who used International Harvester products. At the same time, photography became an increasingly important element in the content and presentation of the magazine. The magazine was discontinued in 1969. |
CONTENTdm file name | 8915.cpd |
Date created | 2008-12-05 |
Date modified | 2010-02-10 |
Description
Title | page 31 |
Object Type | Periodical |
Source | The Harvester World, March 1913 |
Page Number | 31 |
Electronic Publisher | Wisconsin Historical Society |
Physical Description | 7.25 x 10 inches |
Electronic Publication Date | 2008 |
Year | 1913 |
Volume | 004 |
Issue | 03 |
Date | 1913-03 |
Rights | © Copyright 2008 by the Wisconsin Historical Society (Madison, Wisconsin) |
Series | The Harvester World ; v. 4, no. 3 |
Full Text |
The Harvester World 31 material, less what the material was worth for scrap. This brought about a change. The men gradually began to look at the practical side of it. At the start they were simply trying to see how much they could do, regardless of quality; but after they found that they were the losers if the work was spoiled, they were careful then to see that the work was done in proper shape. We went on from year to year with the gradual growth and improvement of machinery and equipment, but the majority of the savings that were made were not made altogether with machinery that you could go in the market and buy. It every little while we get a serious one, and when we have a serious accident it brings up the ratio very rapidly. Every superintendent should study up on im¬ proved methods. Our works' burden is as much as the actual labor in many cases, whereas it could and should be reduced in many ways. Why does it come high? What can we do to reduce that burden. There are a number of ways in which it can be done. If we can cut out enough of the small extra expenses, the sum total will perhaps be larger than we think, but it is certain that we have to do something. When we look at the cost of our machines E was machinery that had been carefully studied out by men who were espe¬ cially adapted to study out ways and means of reducing hand labor and thus get out product for less money and with less men than by the old method. Then we came along to the time when we went entirely to steel machines. That meant quite a change in our machinery. It made it .necessary for us to in¬ vent maciiinery that we could not buy on the market. We had good designers, that could de¬ sign special machinery, special tools, etc., to do the work. And so it has gone on until today it is harder to reduce labor costs by new devices and methods than at the start. That, today, is one of the most serious things we have to contend with. I think every superintend¬ ent will agree that we can¬ not do it by reducing wages. Wages are prac¬ tically fixed; they are gradually increasing rath¬ er than decreasing. We must do it by other agen¬ cies. We have-to do it by imjiroved methods. The prices of materials have their ups and downs; just now they are up, and the cost of labor is up. We have reduced our working hours per week to fifty-five, which naturally adds to the costs. We are doing a good many things that increase overhead costs, such as welfare work, sanitary improvements, etc., in which we are.all inter¬ ested and which are right and proper and the thing to do and we hope to continue leading in them. We are also doing a great deal in safeguarding. In that particular line I think we not only get our money back but save life and limbs. Every time we put a guard on a machine it means that we get back the cost of installation many times over in the prevention of accidents. Many of them, of course, are trifling, but D B On the top B. A, Kennedy — taken in the eighties — and Robert H. Dixon, first Superintendent of Deerings. On the bottom B, A. Kennedy—taken fourteen years ago — and J. H. Pitkin the Veteran Husker and Shredder Authority. today, the prices they sell for, what it costs to sell them, and the small mar gin of profit that is left for us when we get through it is surprising. Now, the question is: What can each and every man sitting around this table tonight do to reduce thecost at his plant? Any¬ thing they can do, or think they can do, will be re¬ ceived with a great deal of pleasure at the main office—any suggestion of any kind. I think we should seriously think of tiiat until each one has brought upsomethingthat is going to help reduce our cost. As I said before, however, the principal thing is in metliods and ways of doing the work. If anyone thinks we can¬ not save anything today on manufacturing, over and above what we are doing now, as regards some particular phase of it or some particular piece of work that he is making, perhaps all he has to do is to sit down and study that piece a while and he will undoubtedly discover that he is not doing it as cheaply as he could. If he studies it carefully, he will find some way in which he can cut off a little bit of labor; and if we all work together, we can soon help to reduce the cost without affecting the quality. I realize it is a hard proposition, but it is a proposi tion we have to meet. It is a manufacturing depart¬ ment's proposition and superintendent's proposition; and of course the superintendents should have and do have men who will put their shoulder to the wheel, and help in every respect they can. When I think of the various things the International Harvester Company does for its employes it causes me to look back to the days when I first started in the shop, and think how little we had except hammering, from morning till night. We had none of the machines that |
Format | TIF |
Full resolution | Volume582\IH190105.tif |
CONTENTdm file name | 8911.jpg |
Date created | 2008-12-05 |
Date modified | 2008-12-05 |