p. 1 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Ùlc I'M
BERKELEY FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT; A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
Spring 1964 - Discriminatory hiring practices led to picketing of Caddilac and
other auto companies. William Knowland*s Oakland Tribune was also
picketed.
Sept. 14
(Mon.)
Sept.30
(Wed.)
Oct. 1
(Thurs.)
Oct. Z
(Fri.)
6p.m.
-Dean of Students Katherine Tolle prohibits political tables
except for informational services.
-Eight students suspended for setting up illegal tables,
soliciting funds, and recruiting members. In sympathy,
500 people sign complicity petition.
-Eighteen groups, including Y-Gops, Y-Dem's, C.O.R.E., S.N.C.C.,
W.E.B. Dubois Club, Youth for Goldwater, and S.L.A.T.E., set
up tables in front of the Administration building.At noon,
Dean and police try to arrest Jack Weinberg. During recess
students surround police car and blocks its exit. The blockade
lasted thirty-two hours-2,000-3000 people during the day,and
four hundeed at night.
-Sympathetic students come from other colleges. At five p.m.,
900 policemen from several cities mas^on campas.
-Ad hoc student leaders begin negotiations. Administration demands
that students cease "illegal demonstrations". Result of
negotiations: 1.Present demonstration to ,s3$tM& University to
drop charges against Weinberg. 2. Weinberg released. 3.Negotiating
study committee created. 4. Cases ui eight students to be judged
by Professor's Academic Committee(this was later denied by the
Adminstration).
Oct. 3,4
(Vfeekend)
Oct 5
(Mon.)
-ïhe creation of the Free Speech Movement of the University of
California. Many nextf groups |oin the movement(three religious
groups, representatives from indépendant student groups, and
a graduate student co-ordinating committee.
- Formation of study group-contains 10 Administration picked
people and 2 F.S.M. people. Total rejection by F.S.M.
-Administration betrays Article 4 of Oct. 2 Pact. Judges eight
students by an administrative rather than a faculty committee.
Students refuse to appear. American Civil Liberties Union
take the case.
Oct. 12
(Mon.)
Study group reorganized(four administrators, four faculty, elected
representatives^ non-F.S.M. student leaders, #F.SnM. student
leaders). This change was a result of F.S.M./threatened protest
and an open hearing at which students and faculty urged change
in study group.
Next five
weeks - Committee proceeded very slowly. Meanwhile, F.S.M. calls a
mosatorium on political activities to await committee report.
Nov. 7 - At the final session of study group,Dean Kidner proposes:Groups
(Sat.) can advocate"lawful" demonstration in terms of state law(this would
prohibit picketing like that of Spring 1964) This plan was rejected.
Object Description
| Title | Berkeley Free Speech Movement : a chronology of events |
| Place of publication | Madison, Wisconsin |
| Publisher | University of Wisconsin Free Speech Movement |
| Publication date | 1964 |
| Language | English |
| Country | United States |
| State | California |
| Digital Format | XML |
| Publisher-Electronic | Wisconsin Historical Society |
| Publication Date-Electronic | 2017 |
| Rights | Copyright belongs to the individuals who created them or the organizations for which they worked. We share them here strictly for non-profit educational purposes. If you believe that you possess copyright to material included here, please contact us at asklibrary@wisconsinhistory.org. Under the fair use provisions of the U.S. copyright law, teachers and students are free to reproduce any document for nonprofit classroom use. Commercial use of copyright-protected material is generally prohibited. |
| Owner | Wisconsin Historical Society |
| Type | Text |
| Digital identifier | giEphemera1123000 |
Description
| Title | p. 1 |
| Language | English |
| Digital Format | JPEG2000 |
| Publisher-Electronic | Wisconsin Historical Society |
| Publication Date-Electronic | 2017 |
| Rights | Copyright belongs to the individuals who created them or the organizations for which they worked. We share them here strictly for non-profit educational purposes. If you believe that you possess copyright to material included here, please contact us at asklibrary@wisconsinhistory.org. Under the fair use provisions of the U.S. copyright law, teachers and students are free to reproduce any document for nonprofit classroom use. Commercial use of copyright-protected material is generally prohibited. |
| Owner | Wisconsin Historical Society |
| Full text | Ùlc I'M BERKELEY FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT; A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS Spring 1964 - Discriminatory hiring practices led to picketing of Caddilac and other auto companies. William Knowland*s Oakland Tribune was also picketed. Sept. 14 (Mon.) Sept.30 (Wed.) Oct. 1 (Thurs.) Oct. Z (Fri.) 6p.m. -Dean of Students Katherine Tolle prohibits political tables except for informational services. -Eight students suspended for setting up illegal tables, soliciting funds, and recruiting members. In sympathy, 500 people sign complicity petition. -Eighteen groups, including Y-Gops, Y-Dem's, C.O.R.E., S.N.C.C., W.E.B. Dubois Club, Youth for Goldwater, and S.L.A.T.E., set up tables in front of the Administration building.At noon, Dean and police try to arrest Jack Weinberg. During recess students surround police car and blocks its exit. The blockade lasted thirty-two hours-2,000-3000 people during the day,and four hundeed at night. -Sympathetic students come from other colleges. At five p.m., 900 policemen from several cities mas^on campas. -Ad hoc student leaders begin negotiations. Administration demands that students cease "illegal demonstrations". Result of negotiations: 1.Present demonstration to ,s3$tM& University to drop charges against Weinberg. 2. Weinberg released. 3.Negotiating study committee created. 4. Cases ui eight students to be judged by Professor's Academic Committee(this was later denied by the Adminstration). Oct. 3,4 (Vfeekend) Oct 5 (Mon.) -ïhe creation of the Free Speech Movement of the University of California. Many nextf groups |oin the movement(three religious groups, representatives from indépendant student groups, and a graduate student co-ordinating committee. - Formation of study group-contains 10 Administration picked people and 2 F.S.M. people. Total rejection by F.S.M. -Administration betrays Article 4 of Oct. 2 Pact. Judges eight students by an administrative rather than a faculty committee. Students refuse to appear. American Civil Liberties Union take the case. Oct. 12 (Mon.) Study group reorganized(four administrators, four faculty, elected representatives^ non-F.S.M. student leaders, #F.SnM. student leaders). This change was a result of F.S.M./threatened protest and an open hearing at which students and faculty urged change in study group. Next five weeks - Committee proceeded very slowly. Meanwhile, F.S.M. calls a mosatorium on political activities to await committee report. Nov. 7 - At the final session of study group,Dean Kidner proposes:Groups (Sat.) can advocate"lawful" demonstration in terms of state law(this would prohibit picketing like that of Spring 1964) This plan was rejected. |
| Type | Text |
| Digital identifier | giEphemera1123001 |